From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
munroesj@us.ibm.com, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@teksavvy.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall()
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:35:34 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1268858134.2335.198.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BA11FD2.2090104@zytor.com>
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 11:30 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Again, this is *exactly* symbol versioning done by hand... we have
> proper symbol versioning, let's use it.
Yeah, whatever, I don't mind what technique you use for the versionning,
ultimately, if the approach works, we can look at those details :-) We
-do- need the macro to strip the dummy argument though, unless we use
a slightly different technique which is to make the __sysno argument
itself 64-bit, which works as well I believe.
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-17 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-15 4:48 64-syscall args on 32-bit vs syscall() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-15 4:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-15 5:06 ` David Miller
2010-03-15 5:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-15 5:54 ` David Miller
2010-03-15 20:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-15 13:44 ` Ralf Baechle
2010-03-15 15:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-15 16:00 ` Ulrich Drepper
2010-03-15 19:00 ` David Miller
2010-03-15 19:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-15 20:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-15 20:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-16 21:56 ` Steven Munroe
2010-03-17 0:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-17 0:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-17 5:52 ` Ulrich Drepper
2010-03-17 8:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-17 9:14 ` Ulrich Drepper
2010-03-17 10:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-17 9:18 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-03-17 10:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-17 18:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-17 20:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2010-03-17 20:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-17 22:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-17 22:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-18 16:08 ` Steven Munroe
2010-03-18 16:21 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-03-18 16:21 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-03-18 17:03 ` Steven Munroe
2010-03-18 21:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-19 1:22 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-03-15 20:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-15 15:03 ` Steven Munroe
2010-03-15 20:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-15 15:04 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-03-15 20:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1268858134.2335.198.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernel@teksavvy.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=munroesj@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).