From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/20] early_res: seperate common memmap func from e820.c to fw_memmap.c Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:07:13 +1100 Message-ID: <1269292033.8599.83.camel@pasglop> References: <4BA6EA62.1030603@kernel.org> <20100321.210023.209981130.davem@davemloft.net> <4BA6F1F6.3070102@kernel.org> <20100321.213350.176660494.davem@davemloft.net> <20100322092809.GA20607@elte.hu> <1269290862.8599.77.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1269290862.8599.77.camel@pasglop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: David Miller , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , yinghai@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 07:47 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 10:28 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Note the other side of the coin: LMB appears to be deployed on only > 4 > > non-x86 > > architectures that muster ~1% of the Linux boxes while early_res is > > deployed > > on more than 95%. > > You use that arguemnt ONE MORE FUCKING TIME and you'll end up in my > killfile with a auto-NACK reply of anything that looks like a patch > from you. Allright, I've calmed down now, so my appologies for going over the top here, I shouldn't reply to emails before breakfast ... but it looks like Thomas made the point a lot more clearly than me or Dave did so it's all good. Let's move on. Cheers, Ben. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:38681 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751541Ab0CVVHd (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:07:33 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/20] early_res: seperate common memmap func from e820.c to fw_memmap.c From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt In-Reply-To: <1269290862.8599.77.camel@pasglop> References: <4BA6EA62.1030603@kernel.org> <20100321.210023.209981130.davem@davemloft.net> <4BA6F1F6.3070102@kernel.org> <20100321.213350.176660494.davem@davemloft.net> <20100322092809.GA20607@elte.hu> <1269290862.8599.77.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:07:13 +1100 Message-ID: <1269292033.8599.83.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: David Miller , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , yinghai@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20100322210713.3vgBNmG_BO3LTLt-OfHetDrMl-fdH55PKi3X56XFYaA@z> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 07:47 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 10:28 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Note the other side of the coin: LMB appears to be deployed on only > 4 > > non-x86 > > architectures that muster ~1% of the Linux boxes while early_res is > > deployed > > on more than 95%. > > You use that arguemnt ONE MORE FUCKING TIME and you'll end up in my > killfile with a auto-NACK reply of anything that looks like a patch > from you. Allright, I've calmed down now, so my appologies for going over the top here, I shouldn't reply to emails before breakfast ... but it looks like Thomas made the point a lot more clearly than me or Dave did so it's all good. Let's move on. Cheers, Ben.