linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Update the cachetlb.txt file WRT flush_dcache_pageand update_mmu_cache
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 15:00:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1273500010.10282.25.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100510115552.GD10452@parisc-linux.org>

On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 12:55 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:16:47AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > In most situations, just doing flushing in set_pte_at() would suffice
> > and flush_dcache_page() can be ignored. There are two situations where I
> > still see flush_dcache_page() useful:
> >
> >      1. SMP systems where the cache maintenance operations aren't
> >         automatically broadcast in hardware
> >      2. The kernel modifies a page cache page that is already mapped in
> >         user space
> >
> > (1) can be worked around on some architectures (though not sure about
> > all of them).
> >
> > Is (2) a valid scenario?
> 
> The kernel always calls kmap() / kunmap() around accesses to page cache
> pages (thanks to x86-32's ability to support 64GB).  There are three
> ways I know of that architectures use this:

I think this was mentioned in some past discussions. There are
situations where page cache pages aren't highmem pages and kmap/kunmap
isn't used:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/44847

But yes, that's a possible solution that ideally would need to be agreed
with the other architectures and write the recommendations in
cachetlb.txt. It may need, however, to update some of the drivers in
Linux.

It would also mean that some architectures need to implement the kmap
API even if they don't need it. That's David Miller's comment on
sparc64:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/44872

> 1) No-ops.  These architectures don't have cache problems.
> 2) Flush the kernel's mapping in kunmap().  This can have bad consequences
> in SMP systems with threaded programs.
> 3) Select an address in kmap() that will alias to the user's address.

3rd point above would help with the D-cache aliasing. Does the I/D cache
coherency need to be handled differently? On PIPT Harvard architectures,
we don't actually have D-cache aliasing but we may end up flushing too
much in kunmap() just in case such page would be mapped in user space
with executable permission.

An alternative for a PIO API which would require fixing individual
drivers was proposed here:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/5136

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-10 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-07 13:24 [RFC PATCH] Update the cachetlb.txt file WRT flush_dcache_page and update_mmu_cache Catalin Marinas
2010-05-10  8:06 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-05-10 10:16   ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-10 10:29     ` Paul Mundt
2010-05-10 14:40       ` James Bottomley
2010-05-10 14:40         ` James Bottomley
2010-05-10 11:55     ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-05-10 14:00       ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2010-05-10 14:03         ` [RFC PATCH] Update the cachetlb.txt file WRT flush_dcache_pageand update_mmu_cache David Miller
2010-05-10 14:32           ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-11 11:31     ` [RFC PATCH] Update the cachetlb.txt file WRT flush_dcache_page and update_mmu_cache FUJITA Tomonori
2010-05-11 17:22       ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1273500010.10282.25.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).