From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/35] lmb: Add find_memory_core_early() Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 12:30:38 +1000 Message-ID: <1273804238.21352.389.camel@pasglop> References: <1273796396-29649-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1273796396-29649-12-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:35418 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754169Ab0ENCb7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2010 22:31:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1273796396-29649-12-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Linus Torvalds , Johannes Weiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 17:19 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > According to node range in early_node_map[] with __lmb_find_area > to find free range. > > Will be used by lmb_find_area_node() > > lmb_find_area_node will be used to find right buffer for NODE_DATA > > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu > --- Oh and this wont' work on sparc. You should probably instead add a lmb_find_in_nid() to lmb which shares code with lmb_alloc_nid(). However, why do you wnat to do this find + separate reserve again ? Why not lmb_alloc ? Cheers, Ben. > include/linux/mm.h | 2 ++ > mm/page_alloc.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h > index fb19bb9..7774e1d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mm.h > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h > @@ -1159,6 +1159,8 @@ extern void free_bootmem_with_active_regions(int nid, > unsigned long max_low_pfn); > int add_from_early_node_map(struct range *range, int az, > int nr_range, int nid); > +u64 __init find_memory_core_early(int nid, u64 size, u64 align, > + u64 goal, u64 limit); > void *__alloc_memory_core_early(int nodeid, u64 size, u64 align, > u64 goal, u64 limit); > typedef int (*work_fn_t)(unsigned long, unsigned long, void *); > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index d03c946..72afd94 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -3393,6 +3394,34 @@ void __init free_bootmem_with_active_regions(int nid, > } > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_LMB > +u64 __init find_memory_core_early(int nid, u64 size, u64 align, > + u64 goal, u64 limit) > +{ > + int i; > + > + /* Need to go over early_node_map to find out good range for node */ > + for_each_active_range_index_in_nid(i, nid) { > + u64 addr; > + u64 ei_start, ei_last; > + > + ei_last = early_node_map[i].end_pfn; > + ei_last <<= PAGE_SHIFT; > + ei_start = early_node_map[i].start_pfn; > + ei_start <<= PAGE_SHIFT; > + addr = __lmb_find_area(ei_start, ei_last, > + goal, limit, size, align); > + > + if (addr == LMB_ERROR) > + continue; > + > + return addr; > + } > + > + return -1ULL; > +} > +#endif > + > int __init add_from_early_node_map(struct range *range, int az, > int nr_range, int nid) > {