From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/35] x86, lmb: Add x86 version of __lmb_find_area() Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 18:31:24 +1000 Message-ID: <1273825884.21352.603.camel@pasglop> References: <1273796396-29649-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1273796396-29649-18-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1273804466.21352.400.camel@pasglop> <4BECF21C.7030006@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:59178 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932221Ab0ENIda (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2010 04:33:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BECF21C.7030006@oracle.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yinghai Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Linus Torvalds , Johannes Weiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 23:47 -0700, Yinghai wrote: > for safe, and there is any problem with top to down allocation, we can > ask user to check if low to high works... > > not just make user to get broken kernel. Hrm. That's a bit gross. But ok, I don't care that much as long as your x86 variant doesn't differ in semantics with the core lmb one and I'll let Peter and/or Thomas to scream at you if they think it's gross (hint: the code is) Cheers, Ben.