From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/35] x86, lmb: Add lmb_reserve_area_overlap_ok() Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 10:39:33 +1000 Message-ID: <1274056773.21352.700.camel@pasglop> References: <1273796396-29649-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1273796396-29649-16-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1273804337.21352.396.camel@pasglop> <4BECF158.5070200@oracle.com> <1273825807.21352.601.camel@pasglop> <4BED7CE3.1020507@oracle.com> <1273876234.21352.639.camel@pasglop> <20100515073231.GB9877@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:57449 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750785Ab0EQAlT (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 May 2010 20:41:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100515073231.GB9877@elte.hu> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Yinghai Lu , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Linus Torvalds , Johannes Weiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 09:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Btw., it would be nice to ready the LMB core bits for > upstream for 2.6.35 if there's agreement about them - > that will make the subsequent x86 patches much easier > to merge. Well, 2.6.34 was released already. I think it's a bit premature. We need to fix a few more things (the result codes for example) and do more testing to ensure we didn't break other archs. Also, Yinghai wants some more changes to the core that I need to discuss with him to understand exactly what he wants and why :-) Cheers, Ben.