From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/35] x86, lmb: Add lmb_reserve_area_overlap_ok() Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 17:24:32 +1000 Message-ID: <1274081072.21352.718.camel@pasglop> References: <1273796396-29649-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1273796396-29649-16-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1273804337.21352.396.camel@pasglop> <4BECF158.5070200@oracle.com> <1273825807.21352.601.camel@pasglop> <4BED7CE3.1020507@oracle.com> <1273876234.21352.639.camel@pasglop> <20100515073231.GB9877@elte.hu> <1274056773.21352.700.camel@pasglop> <4BF0DE0C.2000905@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:60157 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751588Ab0EQH03 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 03:26:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BF0DE0C.2000905@oracle.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yinghai Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Linus Torvalds , Johannes Weiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 23:11 -0700, Yinghai wrote: > so looks like your change will hit 2.6.35, and my x86 changes will hit > 2.6.36? > > that is too long. No. Both will hit 2.6.36. It's way too late to queue up such changes for the 2.6.35 merge window which has already opened. Why would it be "too long" ? I keep asking what the heck is going on with having a time bomb on those patches and yet have to get a satisfactory answer. Cheers, Ben.