From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/23] lmb: Print new doubled array location info Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:19:46 +1000 Message-ID: <1278656386.28659.130.camel@pasglop> References: <1278226587-31213-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1278226587-31213-4-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <201007081255.58049.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <4C36300A.7030606@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C36300A.7030606@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Linus Torvalds , Johannes Weiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org > We can make them to be consistent later. > > current for early mem stage, it is consistent to without -1. > > later I like to see all pci resource could be consistent to without -1 too. No. You won't change what is the de-facto standard all over the kernel to make it consistent with x86 crap. -1 is the right way to print those things. Ben. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:36649 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752912Ab0GIGUV (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:20:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/23] lmb: Print new doubled array location info From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt In-Reply-To: <4C36300A.7030606@kernel.org> References: <1278226587-31213-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1278226587-31213-4-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <201007081255.58049.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <4C36300A.7030606@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:19:46 +1000 Message-ID: <1278656386.28659.130.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Linus Torvalds , Johannes Weiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20100709061946.VbE3dX0-Eqd765xRnqQ03PhQi66324zANmqY9mQ323E@z> > We can make them to be consistent later. > > current for early mem stage, it is consistent to without -1. > > later I like to see all pci resource could be consistent to without -1 too. No. You won't change what is the de-facto standard all over the kernel to make it consistent with x86 crap. -1 is the right way to print those things. Ben.