linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Be
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 42/49] x86, memblock: Add memblock_x86_free_memory_in_range()
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:56:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279583818-14249-43-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1279583818-14249-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>

It will return free memory size in specified range.

We can not use memory_size - reserved_size here, because some reserved area
may not be in the scope of memblock.memory.region.

Use memblock.memory.region subtracting memblock.reserved.region to get free range array.
then count size of all free ranges.

-v2: Ben insist on using _in_range

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h |    1 +
 arch/x86/mm/memblock.c          |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
index 3a86b10..fc3c230 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
@@ -15,5 +15,6 @@ void memblock_x86_register_active_regions(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
 					 unsigned long last_pfn);
 u64 memblock_x86_hole_size(u64 start, u64 end);
 u64 memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(int nid, u64 start, u64 end, u64 size, u64 align);
+u64 memblock_x86_free_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
index a3dece6..3882caa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
@@ -217,6 +217,54 @@ void __init memblock_x86_to_bootmem(u64 start, u64 end)
 }
 #endif
 
+u64 __init memblock_x86_free_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit)
+{
+	int i, count;
+	struct range *range;
+	int nr_range;
+	u64 final_start, final_end;
+	u64 free_size;
+	struct memblock_region *r;
+
+	count = (memblock.reserved.cnt + memblock.memory.cnt) * 2;
+
+	range = find_range_array(count);
+	nr_range = 0;
+
+	addr = PFN_UP(addr);
+	limit = PFN_DOWN(limit);
+
+	for_each_memblock(memory, r) {
+		final_start = PFN_UP(r->base);
+		final_end = PFN_DOWN(r->base + r->size);
+		if (final_start >= final_end)
+			continue;
+		if (final_start >= limit || final_end <= addr)
+			continue;
+
+		nr_range = add_range(range, count, nr_range, final_start, final_end);
+	}
+	subtract_range(range, count, 0, addr);
+	subtract_range(range, count, limit, -1ULL);
+	for_each_memblock(reserved, r) {
+		final_start = PFN_DOWN(r->base);
+		final_end = PFN_UP(r->base + r->size);
+		if (final_start >= final_end)
+			continue;
+		if (final_start >= limit || final_end <= addr)
+			continue;
+
+		subtract_range(range, count, final_start, final_end);
+	}
+	nr_range = clean_sort_range(range, count);
+
+	free_size = 0;
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_range; i++)
+		free_size += range[i].end - range[i].start;
+
+	return free_size << PAGE_SHIFT;
+}
+
 void __init memblock_x86_reserve_range(u64 start, u64 end, char *name)
 {
 	if (start == end)
-- 
1.6.4.2

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 42/49] x86, memblock: Add memblock_x86_free_memory_in_range()
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:56:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279583818-14249-43-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20100719235651.ttwqd8ClaAvgyPaNXaX9FVKMHsTHQuBivi52kJtMY0Q@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1279583818-14249-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>

It will return free memory size in specified range.

We can not use memory_size - reserved_size here, because some reserved area
may not be in the scope of memblock.memory.region.

Use memblock.memory.region subtracting memblock.reserved.region to get free range array.
then count size of all free ranges.

-v2: Ben insist on using _in_range

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h |    1 +
 arch/x86/mm/memblock.c          |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
index 3a86b10..fc3c230 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
@@ -15,5 +15,6 @@ void memblock_x86_register_active_regions(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
 					 unsigned long last_pfn);
 u64 memblock_x86_hole_size(u64 start, u64 end);
 u64 memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(int nid, u64 start, u64 end, u64 size, u64 align);
+u64 memblock_x86_free_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
index a3dece6..3882caa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
@@ -217,6 +217,54 @@ void __init memblock_x86_to_bootmem(u64 start, u64 end)
 }
 #endif
 
+u64 __init memblock_x86_free_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit)
+{
+	int i, count;
+	struct range *range;
+	int nr_range;
+	u64 final_start, final_end;
+	u64 free_size;
+	struct memblock_region *r;
+
+	count = (memblock.reserved.cnt + memblock.memory.cnt) * 2;
+
+	range = find_range_array(count);
+	nr_range = 0;
+
+	addr = PFN_UP(addr);
+	limit = PFN_DOWN(limit);
+
+	for_each_memblock(memory, r) {
+		final_start = PFN_UP(r->base);
+		final_end = PFN_DOWN(r->base + r->size);
+		if (final_start >= final_end)
+			continue;
+		if (final_start >= limit || final_end <= addr)
+			continue;
+
+		nr_range = add_range(range, count, nr_range, final_start, final_end);
+	}
+	subtract_range(range, count, 0, addr);
+	subtract_range(range, count, limit, -1ULL);
+	for_each_memblock(reserved, r) {
+		final_start = PFN_DOWN(r->base);
+		final_end = PFN_UP(r->base + r->size);
+		if (final_start >= final_end)
+			continue;
+		if (final_start >= limit || final_end <= addr)
+			continue;
+
+		subtract_range(range, count, final_start, final_end);
+	}
+	nr_range = clean_sort_range(range, count);
+
+	free_size = 0;
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_range; i++)
+		free_size += range[i].end - range[i].start;
+
+	return free_size << PAGE_SHIFT;
+}
+
 void __init memblock_x86_reserve_range(u64 start, u64 end, char *name)
 {
 	if (start == end)
-- 
1.6.4.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-07-19 23:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-19 23:56 [PATCH -v25 00/49] Use memblock with x86 Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 01/49] x86, numa: fix boot without RAM on node0 again Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 02/49] x86,mm: fix 32bit numa sparsemem Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 03/49] memblock: Rename memblock_region to memblock_type and memblock_property to memblock_region Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 04/49] memblock: No reason to include asm/memblock.h late Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 05/49] memblock: Introduce for_each_memblock() and new accessors, and use it Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 06/49] memblock: Remove nid_range argument, arch provides memblock_nid_range() instead Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 07/49] memblock: Factor the lowest level alloc function Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 08/49] memblock: Expose MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 09/49] memblock: Introduce default allocation limit and use it to replace explicit ones Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 10/49] memblock: Remove rmo_size, burry it in arch/powerpc where it belongs Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 11/49] memblock: Change u64 to phys_addr_t Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 12/49] memblock: Remove unused memblock.debug struct member Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 13/49] memblock: Remove memblock_type.size and add memblock.memory_size instead Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 14/49] memblock: Move memblock arrays to static storage in memblock.c and make their size a variable Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 15/49] memblock: Add debug markers at the end of the array Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 16/49] memblock: Make memblock_find_region() out of memblock_alloc_region() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 17/49] memblock: Define MEMBLOCK_ERROR internally instead of using ~(phys_addr_t)0 Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 18/49] memblock: Move memblock_init() to the bottom of the file Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 19/49] memblock: split memblock_find_base() out of __memblock_alloc_base() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 20/49] memblock: Move functions around into a more sensible order Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 21/49] memblock: Add array resizing support Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 22/49] memblock: Add arch function to control coalescing of memblock memory regions Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 23/49] memblock: Add "start" argument to memblock_find_base() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 24/49] memblock: NUMA allocate can now use early_pfn_map Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 25/49] memblock: Separate memblock_alloc_nid() and memblock_alloc_try_nid() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 26/49] memblock: Make memblock_alloc_try_nid() fallback to MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 27/49] memblock: Add debugfs files to dump the arrays content Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 28/49] memblock: Prepare x86 to use memblock to replace early_res Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 29/49] memblock: Print new doubled array location info Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 30/49] memblock: Export MEMBLOCK_ERROR again Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 31/49] memblock: Prepare to include linux/memblock.h in core file Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 32/49] memblock: Add ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK to put memblock code to .init Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 33/49] memblock: Add memblock_find_in_range() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 34/49] x86, memblock: Add memblock_x86_find_in_range_size() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 35/49] bootmem, x86: Add weak version of reserve_bootmem_generic Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 36/49] x86, memblock: Add memblock_x86_to_bootmem() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 37/49] x86,memblock: Add memblock_x86_reserve_range/memblock_x86_free_range Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 38/49] x86, memblock: Add get_free_all_memory_range() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 39/49] x86, memblock: Add memblock_x86_register_active_regions() and memblock_x86_hole_size() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 40/49] memblock: Add find_memory_core_early() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 41/49] x86, memblock: Add memblock_x86_find_in_range_node() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-07-19 23:56   ` [PATCH 42/49] x86, memblock: Add memblock_x86_free_memory_in_range() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 43/49] x86, memblock: Add memblock_x86_memory_in_range() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 44/49] x86, memblock: Use memblock_debug to control debug message print out Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 45/49] x86: Use memblock to replace early_res Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 46/49] x86: Replace e820_/_early string with memblock_ Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 47/49] x86: Remove not used early_res code Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 48/49] x86, memblock: Use memblock_memory_size()/memblock_free_memory_size() to get correct dma_reserve Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56 ` [PATCH 49/49] x86: remove old bootmem code Yinghai Lu
2010-07-19 23:56   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-20  0:14 ` [PATCH -v25 00/49] Use memblock with x86 Linus Torvalds
2010-07-20  0:35   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-20 18:29     ` H. Peter Anvin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-06 22:38 [PATCH -v23 " Yinghai Lu
2010-07-06 22:39 ` [PATCH 42/49] x86, memblock: Add memblock_x86_free_memory_in_range() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-06 22:39   ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1279583818-14249-43-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).