From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/31] memblock: Factor the lowest level alloc function
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:20:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279822864-17154-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1279822864-17154-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
mm/memblock.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 83643f3..9b71de0 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ static u64 memblock_align_up(u64 addr, u64 size)
return (addr + (size - 1)) & ~(size - 1);
}
-static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_unreserved(u64 start, u64 end,
- u64 size, u64 align)
+static u64 __init memblock_alloc_region(u64 start, u64 end,
+ u64 size, u64 align)
{
u64 base, res_base;
long j;
@@ -318,6 +318,13 @@ static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_unreserved(u64 start, u64 end,
return ~(u64)0;
}
+u64 __weak __init memblock_nid_range(u64 start, u64 end, int *nid)
+{
+ *nid = 0;
+
+ return end;
+}
+
static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_region(struct memblock_region *mp,
u64 size, u64 align, int nid)
{
@@ -333,8 +340,7 @@ static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_region(struct memblock_region *mp,
this_end = memblock_nid_range(start, end, &this_nid);
if (this_nid == nid) {
- u64 ret = memblock_alloc_nid_unreserved(start, this_end,
- size, align);
+ u64 ret = memblock_alloc_region(start, this_end, size, align);
if (ret != ~(u64)0)
return ret;
}
@@ -351,6 +357,10 @@ u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid(u64 size, u64 align, int nid)
BUG_ON(0 == size);
+ /* We do a bottom-up search for a region with the right
+ * nid since that's easier considering how memblock_nid_range()
+ * works
+ */
size = memblock_align_up(size, align);
for (i = 0; i < mem->cnt; i++) {
@@ -383,7 +393,7 @@ u64 __init memblock_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
u64 __init __memblock_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
{
- long i, j;
+ long i;
u64 base = 0;
u64 res_base;
@@ -396,33 +406,24 @@ u64 __init __memblock_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
if (max_addr == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
max_addr = MEMBLOCK_REAL_LIMIT;
+ /* Pump up max_addr */
+ if (max_addr == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
+ max_addr = ~(u64)0;
+
+ /* We do a top-down search, this tends to limit memory
+ * fragmentation by keeping early boot allocs near the
+ * top of memory
+ */
for (i = memblock.memory.cnt - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
u64 memblockbase = memblock.memory.regions[i].base;
u64 memblocksize = memblock.memory.regions[i].size;
if (memblocksize < size)
continue;
- if (max_addr == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
- base = memblock_align_down(memblockbase + memblocksize - size, align);
- else if (memblockbase < max_addr) {
- base = min(memblockbase + memblocksize, max_addr);
- base = memblock_align_down(base - size, align);
- } else
- continue;
-
- while (base && memblockbase <= base) {
- j = memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
- if (j < 0) {
- /* this area isn't reserved, take it */
- if (memblock_add_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size) < 0)
- return 0;
- return base;
- }
- res_base = memblock.reserved.regions[j].base;
- if (res_base < size)
- break;
- base = memblock_align_down(res_base - size, align);
- }
+ base = min(memblockbase + memblocksize, max_addr);
+ res_base = memblock_alloc_region(memblockbase, base, size, align);
+ if (res_base != ~(u64)0)
+ return res_base;
}
return 0;
}
@@ -502,9 +503,3 @@ int memblock_is_region_reserved(u64 base, u64 size)
return memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
}
-u64 __weak memblock_nid_range(u64 start, u64 end, int *nid)
-{
- *nid = 0;
-
- return end;
-}
--
1.6.4.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/31] memblock: Factor the lowest level alloc function
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:20:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279822864-17154-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20100722182038.GQNpfX4qGGm5zHOMuAi8pAnqWuu8K257qPT2-jQDI00@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1279822864-17154-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
mm/memblock.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 83643f3..9b71de0 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ static u64 memblock_align_up(u64 addr, u64 size)
return (addr + (size - 1)) & ~(size - 1);
}
-static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_unreserved(u64 start, u64 end,
- u64 size, u64 align)
+static u64 __init memblock_alloc_region(u64 start, u64 end,
+ u64 size, u64 align)
{
u64 base, res_base;
long j;
@@ -318,6 +318,13 @@ static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_unreserved(u64 start, u64 end,
return ~(u64)0;
}
+u64 __weak __init memblock_nid_range(u64 start, u64 end, int *nid)
+{
+ *nid = 0;
+
+ return end;
+}
+
static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_region(struct memblock_region *mp,
u64 size, u64 align, int nid)
{
@@ -333,8 +340,7 @@ static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_region(struct memblock_region *mp,
this_end = memblock_nid_range(start, end, &this_nid);
if (this_nid == nid) {
- u64 ret = memblock_alloc_nid_unreserved(start, this_end,
- size, align);
+ u64 ret = memblock_alloc_region(start, this_end, size, align);
if (ret != ~(u64)0)
return ret;
}
@@ -351,6 +357,10 @@ u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid(u64 size, u64 align, int nid)
BUG_ON(0 == size);
+ /* We do a bottom-up search for a region with the right
+ * nid since that's easier considering how memblock_nid_range()
+ * works
+ */
size = memblock_align_up(size, align);
for (i = 0; i < mem->cnt; i++) {
@@ -383,7 +393,7 @@ u64 __init memblock_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
u64 __init __memblock_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
{
- long i, j;
+ long i;
u64 base = 0;
u64 res_base;
@@ -396,33 +406,24 @@ u64 __init __memblock_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
if (max_addr == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
max_addr = MEMBLOCK_REAL_LIMIT;
+ /* Pump up max_addr */
+ if (max_addr == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
+ max_addr = ~(u64)0;
+
+ /* We do a top-down search, this tends to limit memory
+ * fragmentation by keeping early boot allocs near the
+ * top of memory
+ */
for (i = memblock.memory.cnt - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
u64 memblockbase = memblock.memory.regions[i].base;
u64 memblocksize = memblock.memory.regions[i].size;
if (memblocksize < size)
continue;
- if (max_addr == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
- base = memblock_align_down(memblockbase + memblocksize - size, align);
- else if (memblockbase < max_addr) {
- base = min(memblockbase + memblocksize, max_addr);
- base = memblock_align_down(base - size, align);
- } else
- continue;
-
- while (base && memblockbase <= base) {
- j = memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
- if (j < 0) {
- /* this area isn't reserved, take it */
- if (memblock_add_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size) < 0)
- return 0;
- return base;
- }
- res_base = memblock.reserved.regions[j].base;
- if (res_base < size)
- break;
- base = memblock_align_down(res_base - size, align);
- }
+ base = min(memblockbase + memblocksize, max_addr);
+ res_base = memblock_alloc_region(memblockbase, base, size, align);
+ if (res_base != ~(u64)0)
+ return res_base;
}
return 0;
}
@@ -502,9 +503,3 @@ int memblock_is_region_reserved(u64 base, u64 size)
return memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
}
-u64 __weak memblock_nid_range(u64 start, u64 end, int *nid)
-{
- *nid = 0;
-
- return end;
-}
--
1.6.4.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-22 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-22 18:20 [PATCH -v26 00/31] generic changes for memblock Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 01/31] memblock: Rename memblock_region to memblock_type and memblock_property to memblock_region Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 02/31] memblock: No reason to include asm/memblock.h late Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 03/31] memblock: Introduce for_each_memblock() and new accessors, and use it Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 04/31] memblock: Remove nid_range argument, arch provides memblock_nid_range() instead Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 05/31] memblock: Factor the lowest level alloc function Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 06/31] memblock: Expose MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 07/31] memblock: Introduce default allocation limit and use it to replace explicit ones Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 08/31] memblock: Remove rmo_size, burry it in arch/powerpc where it belongs Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 09/31] memblock: Change u64 to phys_addr_t Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 10/31] memblock: Remove unused memblock.debug struct member Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 11/31] memblock: Remove memblock_type.size and add memblock.memory_size instead Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 12/31] memblock: Move memblock arrays to static storage in memblock.c and make their size a variable Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 13/31] memblock: Add debug markers at the end of the array Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 14/31] memblock: Make memblock_find_region() out of memblock_alloc_region() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 15/31] memblock: Define MEMBLOCK_ERROR internally instead of using ~(phys_addr_t)0 Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 16/31] memblock: Move memblock_init() to the bottom of the file Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 17/31] memblock: split memblock_find_base() out of __memblock_alloc_base() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 18/31] memblock: Move functions around into a more sensible order Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 19/31] memblock: Add array resizing support Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 20/31] memblock: Add arch function to control coalescing of memblock memory regions Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 21/31] memblock: Add "start" argument to memblock_find_base() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 22/31] memblock: NUMA allocate can now use early_pfn_map Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 23/31] memblock: Separate memblock_alloc_nid() and memblock_alloc_try_nid() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 24/31] memblock: Make memblock_alloc_try_nid() fallback to MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 25/31] memblock: Add debugfs files to dump the arrays content Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 26/31] memblock: Prepare x86 to use memblock to replace early_res Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 27/31] memblock: Print new doubled array location info Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:21 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 28/31] memblock: Export MEMBLOCK_ERROR again Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:21 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-28 5:15 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-28 5:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-28 5:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-28 6:01 ` David Miller
2010-07-28 6:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-28 9:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-28 9:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-28 6:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-28 5:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 29/31] memblock: Prepare to include linux/memblock.h in core file Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:21 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-28 5:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 30/31] memblock: Add ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK to put memblock code to .init Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:21 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-28 5:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 31/31] memblock: Add memblock_find_in_range() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:21 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-28 5:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-28 6:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-28 6:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-28 7:12 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-28 16:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-28 17:02 ` James Bottomley
2010-07-28 17:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-28 18:10 ` James Bottomley
2010-07-28 18:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-28 19:27 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-28 19:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-28 22:58 ` Ralph Campbell
2010-07-28 23:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-28 9:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-28 6:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-22 21:35 ` [PATCH -v26 00/31] generic changes for memblock Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-22 22:00 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1279822864-17154-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).