From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: Make oprofile depend on CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:39:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1284367192.3042.2.camel@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <831bc9523fe04ce899bc78230990033fbe009431.1284357372.git.matt@console-pimps.org>
Hi Matt,
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 07:07 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> Currently, oprofile support is only functional if CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS
> is set. If this symbol is not set, oprofile initialisation will fail at
> runtime. Instead of allowing the oprofile code to build but fail at
> runtime it seems less confusing to not allow the code to be built unless
> hardware performance counter support is available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 +-
> arch/arm/oprofile/common.c | 9 ---------
> 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index a7ed21f..d29075c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ config ARM
> select RTC_LIB
> select SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION
> select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 if (!CPU_32v6K)
> - select HAVE_OPROFILE if (HAVE_PERF_EVENTS)
> + select HAVE_OPROFILE if (HW_PERF_EVENTS)
> select HAVE_ARCH_KGDB
> select HAVE_KPROBES if (!XIP_KERNEL)
> select HAVE_KRETPROBES if (HAVE_KPROBES)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/oprofile/common.c b/arch/arm/oprofile/common.c
> index 9a3ed26..444ea86 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/oprofile/common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/oprofile/common.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
> #include <asm/perf_event.h>
> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS
> static char *op_name_from_perf_id(enum arm_perf_pmu_ids id)
> {
> switch (id) {
> @@ -119,11 +118,3 @@ void __exit oprofile_arch_exit(void)
> {
> oprofile_perf_exit();
> }
> -#else
> -int __init oprofile_arch_init(struct oprofile_operations *ops)
> -{
> - pr_info("oprofile: hardware counters not available\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> -}
> -void __exit oprofile_arch_exit(void) {}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS */
> --
> 1.7.1
When oprofile_arch_init fails (-ENODEV), oprofile will fall back to
timer mode. With this patch, how can you make use of a timer fallback?
I'll try and get around to testing the rest of this series today.
Cheers,
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-13 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-13 6:07 [PATCH V3 0/6] Generalise ARM perf-events backend for oprofile Matt Fleming
2010-09-13 6:07 ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13 6:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] perf: Add helper function to return number of counters Matt Fleming
2010-09-16 12:32 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-13 6:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: oprofile: Rename op_arm to oprofile_perf Matt Fleming
2010-09-16 12:46 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 12:46 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-13 6:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: oprofile: Move non-ARM code into separate init/exit functions Matt Fleming
2010-09-16 12:55 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-13 6:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] oprofile: Abstract the perf-events backend Matt Fleming
2010-09-16 13:15 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-13 6:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: Make oprofile depend on CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS Matt Fleming
2010-09-13 6:07 ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13 8:39 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2010-09-16 13:34 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-13 9:22 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-09-13 6:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] sh: oprofile: Use perf-events oprofile backend Matt Fleming
2010-09-13 6:07 ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-16 14:32 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-27 20:01 ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-27 20:01 ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-27 22:07 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-27 22:07 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-27 22:26 ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-27 22:26 ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-27 22:45 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-27 22:45 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-28 8:33 ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-28 8:33 ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-30 1:04 ` Paul Mundt
2010-09-30 1:04 ` Paul Mundt
2010-09-30 8:14 ` Will Deacon
2010-09-30 8:14 ` Will Deacon
2010-09-13 7:13 ` [PATCH V3 0/6] Generalise ARM perf-events backend for oprofile Marc Titinger
2010-09-13 7:50 ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13 7:50 ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13 8:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-09-13 11:04 ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-13 10:08 ` Will Deacon
2010-09-13 10:08 ` Will Deacon
2010-09-13 11:18 ` Matt Fleming
2010-09-16 14:48 ` Robert Richter
2010-09-16 14:48 ` Robert Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1284367192.3042.2.camel@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).