From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*() Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 07:52:04 +1100 Message-ID: <1290718324.32570.127.camel@pasglop> References: <1290607413.12457.44.camel@concordia> <1290692075.689.20.camel@concordia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:46512 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752111Ab0KYUwm (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:52:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: michael@ellerman.id.au, linux-arch , linux-mips , microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, LKML , linuxppc-dev list , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 15:01 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > I always read it as "for each child-OF-node", so I would rename it to > "dt_for_each_child_node". Well, it was meant to be for_child_of_node not _OF_node :-) Cheers, Ben.