From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] mm: Preemptibility -v6 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:44:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1295347484.30950.495.camel@laptop> References: <20101126143843.801484792@chello.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Andrew Morton , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , David Miller , Nick Piggin , Martin Schwidefsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 23:12 -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote: > 18/21 mutex-provide_mutex_is_contended.patch > I suppose so, though if we use it in the truncate path, then we are > stuck with the vm_truncate_count stuff I'd rather hoped would go aw= ay; > but I guess you're right, that if we did spin_needbreak/need_lockbr= eak > before, then we ought to do this now - though I suspect I only adde= d > it because I had to insert a resched-point anyway, and it seemed a = good > idea at the time to check lockbreak too since that had just been ad= ded.=20 Like the other missed cleanups now possible, these are things we can most definitely look at once the dust settles a bit. I just didn't want to rewrite the world in one go. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([134.117.69.58]:38542 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752011Ab1ARKpK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:45:10 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] mm: Preemptibility -v6 From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: References: <20101126143843.801484792@chello.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:44:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1295347484.30950.495.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Andrew Morton , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , David Miller , Nick Piggin , Martin Schwidefsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Message-ID: <20110118104444.AdB784tzR3KGpGXHFcRR3ejI1c-VkRMpwdJ8K3Wf7-w@z> On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 23:12 -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote: > 18/21 mutex-provide_mutex_is_contended.patch > I suppose so, though if we use it in the truncate path, then we are > stuck with the vm_truncate_count stuff I'd rather hoped would go away; > but I guess you're right, that if we did spin_needbreak/need_lockbreak > before, then we ought to do this now - though I suspect I only added > it because I had to insert a resched-point anyway, and it seemed a good > idea at the time to check lockbreak too since that had just been added. Like the other missed cleanups now possible, these are things we can most definitely look at once the dust settles a bit. I just didn't want to rewrite the world in one go.