From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] mm: Preemptibility -v7 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:28:53 +0100 Message-ID: <1295983733.28776.1072.camel@laptop> References: <20110125173111.720927511@chello.nl> <20110125183240.GA31346@merkur.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110125183240.GA31346@merkur.ravnborg.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Avi Kivity , Thomas Gleixner , Rik van Riel , Ingo Molnar , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , David Miller , Hugh Dickins , Mel Gorman , Nick Piggin , Paul McKenney , Yanmin Zhang List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 19:32 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Foregive me my ignorance.. > Why is this relevant for sparc64 but not for sparc32? >=20 > A quick grep showed up only this in sparc32 specific files: >=20 > mm/init_32.c:DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mmu_gather, mmu_gathers); >=20 > Maybe this is just something sparc32 does not support? sparc32 uses include/asm-generic/tlb.h, whereas sparc64 implements its own variant. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:46326 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751507Ab1AYT2v convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:28:51 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] mm: Preemptibility -v7 From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <20110125183240.GA31346@merkur.ravnborg.org> References: <20110125173111.720927511@chello.nl> <20110125183240.GA31346@merkur.ravnborg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:28:53 +0100 Message-ID: <1295983733.28776.1072.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Avi Kivity , Thomas Gleixner , Rik van Riel , Ingo Molnar , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , David Miller , Hugh Dickins , Mel Gorman , Nick Piggin , Paul McKenney , Yanmin Zhang Message-ID: <20110125192853.v3tVBnCcZnRWLiNWjH30-duwCXCSznKJrFtyWtCBKXs@z> On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 19:32 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Foregive me my ignorance.. > Why is this relevant for sparc64 but not for sparc32? > > A quick grep showed up only this in sparc32 specific files: > > mm/init_32.c:DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mmu_gather, mmu_gathers); > > Maybe this is just something sparc32 does not support? sparc32 uses include/asm-generic/tlb.h, whereas sparc64 implements its own variant.