From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Generalize PCI <-> OF node matching Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 08:30:55 +1000 Message-ID: <1302215455.2458.46.camel@pasglop> References: <1302146796-26825-1-git-send-email-benh@kernel.crashing.org> <20110407.151636.183068185.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:52217 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755867Ab1DGWbH (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2011 18:31:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110407.151636.183068185.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Miller Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bheglaas@google.com, monstr@monstr.eu, tglx@linuxtronix.de, bigeasy@linuxtronix.de On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 15:16 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > This series generalize the PCI <-> OF node matching, moves it to the > > PCI core and make our archs use it. I also rip out while at it a whole > > bunch of useless stuff from microblaze PCI code which was copied from > > ppc32 and is essentially useless there (old workarounds for PowerMac > > and ancient X servers). > > > > Compile tested on x86_64, microblaze, sparc64 and powerpc. > > What tree is this against? None of the microblaze and x86 bits > apply without rejects against Linus's tree, which is where I'm > trying to test this. > > I'll trudge through it, but a heads up about what your patches > are against in the future would be heavily appreciated. Sorry about that, it's Linus as of 3 days ago or so, commit 44148a667d3715f3a1c37eeff7e954c946cc1efe. I'm surprised it would have changed that significantly since then but I'll check & fixup, I can send a new one later today. I'll make sure to specify the "anchor" commit next time. Cheers, Ben.