From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de
Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/7] remove CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_{NEXT_BIT,BIT_LE,LAST_BIT}
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:20:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303910411-15793-1-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com> (raw)
Changelog v3:
- Add Acked-by: lines
- Make m68knommu build fix come first for 2.6.39 inclusion
Changelog v2:
- Add Acked-by: line
- Rebase to mainline
The style that we normally use in asm-generic is to test the macro itself
for existence, so in asm-generic, do:
#ifndef find_next_zero_bit_le
extern unsigned long find_next_zero_bit_le(const void *addr,
unsigned long size, unsigned long offset);
#endif
and in the architectures, write
static inline unsigned long find_next_zero_bit_le(const void *addr,
unsigned long size, unsigned long offset)
#define find_next_zero_bit_le find_next_zero_bit_le
But CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_{NEXT_BIT,BIT_LE,LAST_BIT} options are used to
test for existence of find bitops now.
This patch series switches find bitops to follow the normal style
described above. This change enables arm and s390 to use
asm-generic/bitops/le.h header file.
Akinobu Mita (7):
m68knommu: fix build error due to the lack of find_next_bit_le()
arch: add #define for each of optimized find bitops
bitops: add #ifndef for each of find bitops
arch: remove CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_{NEXT_BIT,BIT_LE,LAST_BIT}
arm: use asm-generic/bitops/le.h
s390: use asm-generic/bitops/le.h
m68knommu: use generic find_next_bit_le()
arch/alpha/Kconfig | 4 ---
arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h | 46 ++++++------------------------------
arch/avr32/include/asm/bitops.h | 15 ++++++++++++
arch/blackfin/Kconfig | 3 --
arch/cris/Kconfig | 4 ---
arch/frv/Kconfig | 8 ------
arch/h8300/Kconfig | 8 ------
arch/ia64/Kconfig | 4 ---
arch/m32r/Kconfig | 8 ------
arch/m68k/Kconfig.nommu | 4 ---
arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_mm.h | 8 ++++++
arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h | 4 +++
arch/microblaze/Kconfig | 6 -----
arch/mips/Kconfig | 8 ------
arch/mn10300/Kconfig | 3 --
arch/parisc/Kconfig | 8 ------
arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 8 ------
arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h | 45 ++++++++----------------------------
arch/score/Kconfig | 3 --
arch/sh/Kconfig | 6 -----
arch/sparc/Kconfig | 8 ------
arch/tile/Kconfig | 1 -
arch/um/Kconfig.x86 | 1 -
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 -
arch/xtensa/Kconfig | 6 -----
include/asm-generic/bitops/find.h | 4 +++
include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h | 7 +++++
include/linux/bitops.h | 4 +-
lib/Kconfig | 10 --------
lib/Makefile | 9 ++-----
lib/find_last_bit.c | 4 +++
lib/find_next_bit.c | 18 +++++++++-----
32 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 199 deletions(-)
--
1.7.4.4
next reply other threads:[~2011-04-27 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-27 13:20 Akinobu Mita [this message]
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] m68knommu: fix build error due to the lack of find_next_bit_le() Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` Akinobu Mita
2011-05-03 6:58 ` Greg Ungerer
2011-05-03 9:11 ` Akinobu Mita
2011-05-03 9:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] arch: add #define for each of optimized find bitops Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 14:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] bitops: add #ifndef for each of " Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] arch: remove CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_{NEXT_BIT,BIT_LE,LAST_BIT} Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] arm: use asm-generic/bitops/le.h Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] s390: " Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] m68knommu: use generic find_next_bit_le() Akinobu Mita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1303910411-15793-1-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--to=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).