From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonas Bonn Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/19] OpenRISC: Module support Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:05:39 +0200 Message-ID: <1308773139.20122.5268.camel@localhost> References: <1308483825-6023-1-git-send-email-jonas@southpole.se> <201106221626.12023.arnd@arndb.de> <1308770050.20122.4951.camel@localhost> <201106222158.11381.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.southpole.se ([193.12.106.18]:56122 "EHLO mail.southpole.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758835Ab1FVUFn (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:05:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <201106222158.11381.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 21:58 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 22 June 2011 21:14:10 Jonas Bonn wrote: > > What's an acceptable "comment title"? Most other arch's seem to put the > > filename there... I understand this is undesirable, but what can I put > > there instead? Is "OpenRISC Linux" acceptable, or is nothing at all > > preferable? > > > > Just want to be clear about what's allowed before I go changing all of > > these... > > You don't really need anything in the comment, if you want to put something > there, I'd recommend a one-line summary of what the file is used for. > No license information, copyright, etc? Nothing? Would it be preferable to delete the comments altogether...? /Jonas