From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] memblock: Use MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE instead of ANYWHERE in memblock_alloc_try_nid()
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:58:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310457490-3356-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310457490-3356-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
After node affine allocation fails, memblock_alloc_try_nid() calls
memblock_alloc_base() with @max_addr set to MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE.
This is inconsistent with memblock_alloc() and what the function's
sole user - sparc/mm/init_64 - expects, although it doesn't make any
difference as sparc64 doesn't have highmem and ACCESSIBLE equals
ANYWHERE.
This patch makes memblock_alloc_try_nid() use ACCESSIBLE instead of
ANYWHERE. This isn't complete as node affine allocation doesn't
consider memblock.current_limit. It will be handled with future
changes.
This patch doesn't introduce any behavior difference.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
mm/memblock.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index a0562d1..87e512d 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_try_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, i
if (res)
return res;
- return memblock_alloc_base(size, align, MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE);
+ return memblock_alloc_base(size, align, MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE);
}
--
1.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-12 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-12 7:58 [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Misc cleanups Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 7:58 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86: Fix memblock_x86_check_reserved_size() use in efi_reserve_boot_services() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 7:58 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 7:58 ` [PATCH 2/6] bootmem: Fix __free_pages_bootmem() to use @order properly Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 7:58 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 7:58 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-07-12 7:58 ` [PATCH 3/6] memblock: Use MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE instead of ANYWHERE in memblock_alloc_try_nid() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 7:58 ` [PATCH 4/6] memblock: Use round_up/down() instead of memblock_align_up/down() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 7:58 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 7:58 ` [PATCH 5/6] memblock: Kill MEMBLOCK_ERROR Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 7:58 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 7:58 ` [PATCH 6/6] memblock: Replace memblock_find_base() with memblock_find_in_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 7:58 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1310457490-3356-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).