From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Salter Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/24] C6X: interrupt handling Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:08:22 -0400 Message-ID: <1314047303.2404.23.camel@deneb.redhat.com> References: <1314043785-2880-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> <1314043785-2880-12-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> <2384053.HX3gjK1Rxm@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:20903 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751530Ab1HVVIg (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:08:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <2384053.HX3gjK1Rxm@wuerfel> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Benjamin Herrenschmidt On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 22:58 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 22 August 2011 16:09:32 Mark Salter wrote: > > > > Most of the code in arch/c6x/kernel/irq.c which supports mapping of hardware > > interrupts to virtual kernel interrupts was taken as-is from powerpc. Very > > few changes were necessary for C6X, so separating that out into the generic > > kernel interrupt code may be worthwhile for cases where other architectures > > may want to use it. > > What's the status on this? Did you talk about this with Thomas and/or BenH? > No. That paragraph was a reminder to myself as much as anything and I meant to CC thomas on that patch but, uh, forgot. *sigh* --Mark