From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] C6X: New architecture patch set Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:27:30 +0200 Message-ID: <1314293250.27911.36.camel@twins> References: <1314043785-2880-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> <1314284011.27911.29.camel@twins> <1314288020.2344.30.camel@deneb.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:36177 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754411Ab1HYR1q convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:27:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1314288020.2344.30.camel@deneb.redhat.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Salter Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 12:00 -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 16:53 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > It would be ever so nice to also point us to a binutils/gcc > > source/patch > > so that we can actually compile this muck. > > Sorry. I did so in the earlier patch series. > > http://www.codesourcery.com/sgpp/lite/c6000/portal/release1882 OK, so is all that properly merged in upstream binutils/gcc ? These codesourcery things are an utter friggin pain since they release a complete source tree for each target instead of patches. Nor do they release a single source for all targets. For someone who wants to simply be able to cross-compile all linux kernel archs life is hell, and looking at all these new archs recently that hell is only getting worse.