From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Salter Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] C6X: New architecture patch set Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:34:04 -0400 Message-ID: <1314293645.2344.34.camel@deneb.redhat.com> References: <1314043785-2880-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> <1314284011.27911.29.camel@twins> <1314288020.2344.30.camel@deneb.redhat.com> <1314293250.27911.36.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39929 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752386Ab1HYReK (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:34:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1314293250.27911.36.camel@twins> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 19:27 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 12:00 -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 16:53 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > It would be ever so nice to also point us to a binutils/gcc > > > source/patch > > > so that we can actually compile this muck. > > > > Sorry. I did so in the earlier patch series. > > > > http://www.codesourcery.com/sgpp/lite/c6000/portal/release1882 > > OK, so is all that properly merged in upstream binutils/gcc ? Mostly, I think. There is enough in place to make a toolchain to build kernels. We have seen some issues when using the latest devel head tools, but I'm not sure if that is the c6x bits or just the usual devel breakage. In any case, folks are working on it. --Mark