linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	tony.luck@intel.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	liqin.chen@sunplusct.com, lethal@linux-sh.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, jonas@southpole.se,
	lennox.wu@gmail.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 11/23] powerpc: Cleanup memblock usage
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:31:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322508685-32532-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322508685-32532-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

* early_init_devtree(): Total memory size is aligned to PAGE_SIZE;
  however, alignment isn't enforced if memory_limit is explicitly
  specified.  Simplify the logic and always apply PAGE_SIZE alignment.

* MMU_init(): memblock regions is truncated by directly modifying
  memblock.memory.cnt.  This is incomplete (reserved array is not
  truncated) and unnecessarily low level hindering further memblock
  improvments.  Use memblock_enforce_memory_limit() instead.

* wii_memory_fixups(): Unnecessarily low level direct manipulation of
  memblock regions.  The same result can be achieved using properly
  abstracted operations.  Reimplement using memblock API.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c               |   17 ++++++-----------
 arch/powerpc/mm/init_32.c                |    2 +-
 arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/wii.c |   22 +++++++++-------------
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
index a7ee83e..28500d4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
@@ -754,17 +754,12 @@ void __init early_init_devtree(void *params)
 	early_reserve_mem();
 	phyp_dump_reserve_mem();
 
-	limit = memory_limit;
-	if (! limit) {
-		phys_addr_t memsize;
-
-		/* Ensure that total memory size is page-aligned, because
-		 * otherwise mark_bootmem() gets upset. */
-		memblock_analyze();
-		memsize = memblock_phys_mem_size();
-		if ((memsize & PAGE_MASK) != memsize)
-			limit = memsize & PAGE_MASK;
-	}
+	/*
+	 * Ensure that total memory size is page-aligned, because otherwise
+	 * mark_bootmem() gets upset.
+	 */
+	memblock_analyze();
+	limit = ALIGN(memory_limit ?: memblock_phys_mem_size(), PAGE_SIZE);
 	memblock_enforce_memory_limit(limit);
 
 	memblock_analyze();
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/init_32.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/init_32.c
index 161cefd..12bb528 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/init_32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/init_32.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ void __init MMU_init(void)
 
 	if (memblock.memory.cnt > 1) {
 #ifndef CONFIG_WII
-		memblock.memory.cnt = 1;
+		memblock_enforce_memory_limit(memblock.memory.regions[0].size);
 		memblock_analyze();
 		printk(KERN_WARNING "Only using first contiguous memory region");
 #else
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/wii.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/wii.c
index 1b5dc1a..1cbe9d3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/wii.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/wii.c
@@ -79,23 +79,19 @@ void __init wii_memory_fixups(void)
 	BUG_ON(memblock.memory.cnt != 2);
 	BUG_ON(!page_aligned(p[0].base) || !page_aligned(p[1].base));
 
-	p[0].size = _ALIGN_DOWN(p[0].size, PAGE_SIZE);
-	p[1].size = _ALIGN_DOWN(p[1].size, PAGE_SIZE);
+	/* trim unaligned tail */
+	memblock_remove(ALIGN(p[1].base + p[1].size, PAGE_SIZE),
+			(phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX);
 
-	wii_hole_start = p[0].base + p[0].size;
+	/* determine hole, add & reserve them */
+	wii_hole_start = ALIGN(p[0].base + p[0].size, PAGE_SIZE);
 	wii_hole_size = p[1].base - wii_hole_start;
-
-	pr_info("MEM1: <%08llx %08llx>\n", p[0].base, p[0].size);
-	pr_info("HOLE: <%08lx %08lx>\n", wii_hole_start, wii_hole_size);
-	pr_info("MEM2: <%08llx %08llx>\n", p[1].base, p[1].size);
-
-	p[0].size += wii_hole_size + p[1].size;
-
-	memblock.memory.cnt = 1;
+	memblock_add(wii_hole_start, wii_hole_size);
+	memblock_reserve(wii_hole_start, wii_hole_size);
 	memblock_analyze();
 
-	/* reserve the hole */
-	memblock_reserve(wii_hole_start, wii_hole_size);
+	BUG_ON(memblock.memory.cnt != 1);
+	__memblock_dump_all();
 
 	/* allow ioremapping the address space in the hole */
 	__allow_ioremap_reserved = 1;
-- 
1.7.3.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-28 19:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-28 19:31 [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[], take 2 Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 01/23] memblock: Fix include breakages caused by 24aa07882b Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 02/23] memblock: Make memblock_{add|remove|free|reserve}() return int and update prototypes Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 03/23] memblock: Use memblock_reserve() in memblock internal functions Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 04/23] memblock: Add __memblock_dump_all() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 05/23] memblock: Kill sentinel entries at the end of static region arrays Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 06/23] memblock: Kill memblock_init() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 07/23] memblock: Separate out memblock_isolate_range() from memblock_set_node() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 08/23] memblock: Reimplement __memblock_remove() using memblock_isolate_range() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 09/23] memblock: Make memblock functions handle overflowing range @size Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 10/23] memblock: Reimplement memblock_enforce_memory_limit() using __memblock_remove() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-11-28 19:31   ` [PATCH 11/23] powerpc: Cleanup memblock usage Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 12/23] memblock: Track total size of regions automatically Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 13/23] memblock: s/memblock_analyze()/memblock_allow_resize()/ and update users Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 14/23] memblock: Implement memblock_add_node() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 15/23] powerpc: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 16/23] sparc: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 17/23] SuperH: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 18/23] ia64: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 19/23] mips: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-08 16:19   ` Ralf Baechle
2011-12-08 16:19     ` Ralf Baechle
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 20/23] s390: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 21/23] score: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 22/23] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31   ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 23/23] memblock: Reimplement memblock allocation using reverse free area iterator Tejun Heo
2011-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[], take 2 Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 16:31   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 17:12   ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-05 17:26     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 20:26   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-26 15:35 [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 11/23] powerpc: Cleanup memblock usage Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1322508685-32532-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jonas@southpole.se \
    --cc=lennox.wu@gmail.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liqin.chen@sunplusct.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).