From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
liqin.chen@sunplusct.com, lethal@linux-sh.org,
davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, jonas@southpole.se,
lennox.wu@gmail.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 20/23] s390: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:31:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322508685-32532-21-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322508685-32532-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
s390 used early_node_map[] just to prime free_area_init_nodes(). Now
memblock can be used for the same purpose and early_node_map[] is
scheduled to be dropped. Use memblock instead.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/s390/Kconfig | 3 +++
arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
index 373679b..e383caf 100644
--- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
@@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ config S390
select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL if !MARCH_G5
select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP
select ARCH_SAVE_PAGE_KEYS if HIBERNATION
+ select HAVE_MEMBLOCK
+ select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
+ select ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_TRYLOCK
select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_TRYLOCK_BH
select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_LOCK
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
index e58a462..a2850df 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/memblock.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/stddef.h>
#include <linux/unistd.h>
@@ -820,7 +821,8 @@ setup_memory(void)
end_chunk = min(end_chunk, end_pfn);
if (start_chunk >= end_chunk)
continue;
- add_active_range(0, start_chunk, end_chunk);
+ memblock_add_node(PFN_PHYS(start_chunk),
+ PFN_PHYS(end_chunk - start_chunk), 0);
pfn = max(start_chunk, start_pfn);
for (; pfn < end_chunk; pfn++)
page_set_storage_key(PFN_PHYS(pfn),
--
1.7.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-28 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-28 19:31 [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[], take 2 Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 01/23] memblock: Fix include breakages caused by 24aa07882b Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 02/23] memblock: Make memblock_{add|remove|free|reserve}() return int and update prototypes Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 03/23] memblock: Use memblock_reserve() in memblock internal functions Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 04/23] memblock: Add __memblock_dump_all() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 05/23] memblock: Kill sentinel entries at the end of static region arrays Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 06/23] memblock: Kill memblock_init() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 07/23] memblock: Separate out memblock_isolate_range() from memblock_set_node() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 08/23] memblock: Reimplement __memblock_remove() using memblock_isolate_range() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 09/23] memblock: Make memblock functions handle overflowing range @size Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 10/23] memblock: Reimplement memblock_enforce_memory_limit() using __memblock_remove() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 11/23] powerpc: Cleanup memblock usage Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 12/23] memblock: Track total size of regions automatically Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 13/23] memblock: s/memblock_analyze()/memblock_allow_resize()/ and update users Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 14/23] memblock: Implement memblock_add_node() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 15/23] powerpc: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 16/23] sparc: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 17/23] SuperH: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 18/23] ia64: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 19/23] mips: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-08 16:19 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-12-08 16:19 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 20/23] s390: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 21/23] score: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 22/23] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 23/23] memblock: Reimplement memblock allocation using reverse free area iterator Tejun Heo
2011-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[], take 2 Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 16:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 17:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-05 17:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 20:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-26 15:35 [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 20/23] s390: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1322508685-32532-21-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jonas@southpole.se \
--cc=lennox.wu@gmail.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liqin.chen@sunplusct.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).