From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
liqin.chen@sunplusct.com, lethal@linux-sh.org,
davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, jonas@southpole.se,
lennox.wu@gmail.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 06/23] memblock: Kill memblock_init()
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:31:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322508685-32532-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322508685-32532-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
memblock_init() initializes arrays for regions and memblock itself;
however, all these can be done with struct initializers and
memblock_init() can be removed. This patch kills memblock_init() and
initializes memblock with struct initializer.
The only difference is that the first dummy entries don't have .nid
set to MAX_NUMNODES initially. This doesn't cause any behavior
difference.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
---
arch/arm/mm/init.c | 1 -
arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c | 1 -
arch/openrisc/kernel/prom.c | 1 -
arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 2 -
arch/sh/mm/init.c | 1 -
arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c | 2 -
arch/unicore32/mm/init.c | 1 -
arch/x86/kernel/head32.c | 2 -
arch/x86/kernel/head64.c | 2 -
arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 2 -
include/linux/memblock.h | 1 -
mm/memblock.c | 48 ++++++++++++-----------------------------
12 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
index 9863f03..4140843 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
@@ -333,7 +333,6 @@ void __init arm_memblock_init(struct meminfo *mi, struct machine_desc *mdesc)
sort(&meminfo.bank, meminfo.nr_banks, sizeof(meminfo.bank[0]), meminfo_cmp, NULL);
- memblock_init();
for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_banks; i++)
memblock_add(mi->bank[i].start, mi->bank[i].size);
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c
index 977484a..4d65e97 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c
+++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c
@@ -122,7 +122,6 @@ void __init early_init_devtree(void *params)
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_chosen, cmd_line);
/* Scan memory nodes and rebuild MEMBLOCKs */
- memblock_init();
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_root, NULL);
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_memory, NULL);
diff --git a/arch/openrisc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/openrisc/kernel/prom.c
index 1bb58ba..7dbc6e0 100644
--- a/arch/openrisc/kernel/prom.c
+++ b/arch/openrisc/kernel/prom.c
@@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ void __init early_init_devtree(void *params)
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_chosen, cmd_line);
/* Scan memory nodes and rebuild MEMBLOCKs */
- memblock_init();
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_root, NULL);
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_memory, NULL);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
index fa1235b..a7ee83e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
@@ -733,8 +733,6 @@ void __init early_init_devtree(void *params)
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_chosen_ppc, cmd_line);
/* Scan memory nodes and rebuild MEMBLOCKs */
- memblock_init();
-
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_root, NULL);
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_memory_ppc, NULL);
diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/init.c b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
index 939ca0f..2528962 100644
--- a/arch/sh/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
@@ -324,7 +324,6 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
unsigned long vaddr, end;
int nid;
- memblock_init();
sh_mv.mv_mem_init();
early_reserve_mem();
diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c b/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c
index 8584a25..f42cc87 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c
@@ -1769,8 +1769,6 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
sun4v_ktsb_init();
}
- memblock_init();
-
/* Find available physical memory...
*
* Read it twice in order to work around a bug in openfirmware.
diff --git a/arch/unicore32/mm/init.c b/arch/unicore32/mm/init.c
index 5fb09e2..01e235b 100644
--- a/arch/unicore32/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/unicore32/mm/init.c
@@ -246,7 +246,6 @@ void __init uc32_memblock_init(struct meminfo *mi)
sort(&meminfo.bank, meminfo.nr_banks, sizeof(meminfo.bank[0]),
meminfo_cmp, NULL);
- memblock_init();
for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_banks; i++)
memblock_add(mi->bank[i].start, mi->bank[i].size);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head32.c
index be9282b..51ff186 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head32.c
@@ -31,8 +31,6 @@ static void __init i386_default_early_setup(void)
void __init i386_start_kernel(void)
{
- memblock_init();
-
memblock_reserve(__pa_symbol(&_text),
__pa_symbol(&__bss_stop) - __pa_symbol(&_text));
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
index fd25b11..3a3b779 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
@@ -98,8 +98,6 @@ void __init x86_64_start_reservations(char *real_mode_data)
{
copy_bootdata(__va(real_mode_data));
- memblock_init();
-
memblock_reserve(__pa_symbol(&_text),
__pa_symbol(&__bss_stop) - __pa_symbol(&_text));
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
index 1f92865..12eb07b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -1215,8 +1215,6 @@ asmlinkage void __init xen_start_kernel(void)
local_irq_disable();
early_boot_irqs_disabled = true;
- memblock_init();
-
xen_raw_console_write("mapping kernel into physical memory\n");
pgd = xen_setup_kernel_pagetable(pgd, xen_start_info->nr_pages);
xen_ident_map_ISA();
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index 1a3bee7..6ac91c5 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ phys_addr_t memblock_find_in_range(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
int memblock_free_reserved_regions(void);
int memblock_reserve_reserved_regions(void);
-void memblock_init(void);
void memblock_analyze(void);
int memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
int memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index e808df8..5bbb87f 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -20,12 +20,23 @@
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/memblock.h>
-struct memblock memblock __initdata_memblock;
+static struct memblock_region memblock_memory_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS] __initdata_memblock;
+static struct memblock_region memblock_reserved_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS] __initdata_memblock;
+
+struct memblock memblock __initdata_memblock = {
+ .memory.regions = memblock_memory_init_regions,
+ .memory.cnt = 1, /* empty dummy entry */
+ .memory.max = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS,
+
+ .reserved.regions = memblock_reserved_init_regions,
+ .reserved.cnt = 1, /* empty dummy entry */
+ .reserved.max = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS,
+
+ .current_limit = MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE,
+};
int memblock_debug __initdata_memblock;
int memblock_can_resize __initdata_memblock;
-static struct memblock_region memblock_memory_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS] __initdata_memblock;
-static struct memblock_region memblock_reserved_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS] __initdata_memblock;
/* inline so we don't get a warning when pr_debug is compiled out */
static inline const char *memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type)
@@ -920,37 +931,6 @@ void __init memblock_analyze(void)
memblock_can_resize = 1;
}
-void __init memblock_init(void)
-{
- static int init_done __initdata = 0;
-
- if (init_done)
- return;
- init_done = 1;
-
- /* Hookup the initial arrays */
- memblock.memory.regions = memblock_memory_init_regions;
- memblock.memory.max = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS;
- memblock.reserved.regions = memblock_reserved_init_regions;
- memblock.reserved.max = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS;
-
- /* Create a dummy zero size MEMBLOCK which will get coalesced away later.
- * This simplifies the memblock_add() code below...
- */
- memblock.memory.regions[0].base = 0;
- memblock.memory.regions[0].size = 0;
- memblock_set_region_node(&memblock.memory.regions[0], MAX_NUMNODES);
- memblock.memory.cnt = 1;
-
- /* Ditto. */
- memblock.reserved.regions[0].base = 0;
- memblock.reserved.regions[0].size = 0;
- memblock_set_region_node(&memblock.reserved.regions[0], MAX_NUMNODES);
- memblock.reserved.cnt = 1;
-
- memblock.current_limit = MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE;
-}
-
static int __init early_memblock(char *p)
{
if (p && strstr(p, "debug"))
--
1.7.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-28 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-28 19:31 [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[], take 2 Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 01/23] memblock: Fix include breakages caused by 24aa07882b Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 02/23] memblock: Make memblock_{add|remove|free|reserve}() return int and update prototypes Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 03/23] memblock: Use memblock_reserve() in memblock internal functions Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 04/23] memblock: Add __memblock_dump_all() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 05/23] memblock: Kill sentinel entries at the end of static region arrays Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 06/23] memblock: Kill memblock_init() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 07/23] memblock: Separate out memblock_isolate_range() from memblock_set_node() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 08/23] memblock: Reimplement __memblock_remove() using memblock_isolate_range() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 09/23] memblock: Make memblock functions handle overflowing range @size Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 10/23] memblock: Reimplement memblock_enforce_memory_limit() using __memblock_remove() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 11/23] powerpc: Cleanup memblock usage Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 12/23] memblock: Track total size of regions automatically Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 13/23] memblock: s/memblock_analyze()/memblock_allow_resize()/ and update users Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 14/23] memblock: Implement memblock_add_node() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 15/23] powerpc: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 16/23] sparc: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 17/23] SuperH: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 18/23] ia64: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 19/23] mips: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-08 16:19 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-12-08 16:19 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 20/23] s390: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 21/23] score: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 22/23] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 23/23] memblock: Reimplement memblock allocation using reverse free area iterator Tejun Heo
2011-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[], take 2 Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 16:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 17:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-05 17:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 20:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-26 15:35 [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 06/23] memblock: Kill memblock_init() Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1322508685-32532-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jonas@southpole.se \
--cc=lennox.wu@gmail.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=liqin.chen@sunplusct.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).