From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[], take 2 Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:26:53 +1100 Message-ID: <1323116813.660.20.camel@pasglop> References: <1322508685-32532-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20111205163148.GA25909@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:38489 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932174Ab1LEU2D (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:28:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111205163148.GA25909@elte.hu> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Tejun Heo , yinghai@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, tony.luck@intel.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, liqin.chen@sunplusct.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, jonas@southpole.se, lennox.wu@gmail.com On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 17:31 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Tejun Heo wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > This patchset was posted quite a while ago but got lost during the > > korg disturbance and I forgot about it too. Thankfully, benh pinged > > me about testing this patchset yesterday, so here's the refreshed > > version. > > A bit scary - you should get it into linux-next i suspect - if > that works out then we could then put it into tip:core/memblock > if there are no objections from anyone. > > It's not really an x86 tree and most of the changes are > affecting non-x86 architectures, right? They do look nice tho. I've asked some folks familiar with NUMA stuff here at IBM to give them a spin on power, haven't heard back yet. Cheers, Ben.