From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Salter Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] arch: set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask() Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:45:01 -0500 Message-ID: <1329227102.2395.58.camel@deneb.redhat.com> References: <1329219673-28711-1-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32219 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755040Ab2BNNpK (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:45:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1329219673-28711-1-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Matt Fleming Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matt Fleming On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 11:40 +0000, Matt Fleming wrote: > From: Matt Fleming > > This series simplifies the architecture code for handling signals by > making use of set_current_blocked() introduced in e6fa16ab ("signal: > sigprocmask() should do retarget_shared_pending()") and > block_sigmask() introduced in commit 5e6292c0f28f ("signal: add > block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked"). > ... > Matt Fleming (39): ... > C6X: Use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask() ... > arch/c6x/kernel/signal.c | 16 ++---------- The c6x patch seems to be missing from the series. --Mark