From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Salter Subject: RE: [Linux-c6x-dev] [PATCH 06/35] Disintegrate asm/system.h for C6X [ver #2] Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:39:45 -0400 Message-ID: <1331732387.2167.9.camel@deneb.redhat.com> References: <20120312233602.13888.27659.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20120312233706.13888.5678.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1331728169.2167.2.camel@deneb.redhat.com> <553CFBBAF1315044BC4CD328C97B0B1C17FA0A76@DNCE02.ent.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46177 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752988Ab2CNNjv (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:39:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <553CFBBAF1315044BC4CD328C97B0B1C17FA0A76@DNCE02.ent.ti.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Jacquiot, Aurelien" Cc: David Howells , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "paul.gortmaker@windriver.com" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 13:29 +0000, Jacquiot, Aurelien wrote: > Mark, > > Are you sure about the #define _ASM_C6X_BARRIER_H in exec.h? > _ASM_C6X_EXEC_H sounds better... Thanks! Copy and paste mistake. FYI, I plan on getting rid of the C6X version and using the generic version once it is available.