From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Salter Subject: Re: [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:20:01 -0400 Message-ID: <1347315603-30027-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> References: <20120907182004.GE13973@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30451 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752686Ab2IJWUI (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:20:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120907182004.GE13973@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Al Viro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Mark Salter C6X works fine with these patches to switch over to generic code. Mark Salter (2): c6x: implement ret_from_kernel_execve() and switch to generic kernel_execve() c6x: switch to generic sys_execve() arch/c6x/include/asm/syscalls.h | 5 --- arch/c6x/include/asm/unistd.h | 3 ++ arch/c6x/kernel/entry.S | 54 +++++++++++++++++--------------------- arch/c6x/kernel/process.c | 22 ---------------- 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) -- 1.7.9.1