From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Salter Subject: Re: [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:26:36 -0400 Message-ID: <1348244799-16013-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> References: <20120917032651.GU13973@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54736 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752579Ab2IUQ04 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:26:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120917032651.GU13973@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Al Viro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Mark Salter Here are a set of c6x patches to work with your experimental-kernel_thread branch. Mark Salter (3): c6x: add ret_from_kernel_thread(), simplify kernel_thread() c6x: switch to generic kernel_execve c6x: switch to generic sys_execve arch/c6x/include/asm/syscalls.h | 5 --- arch/c6x/include/asm/unistd.h | 3 ++ arch/c6x/kernel/entry.S | 56 +++++++++++++++++------------------- arch/c6x/kernel/process.c | 60 ++++++++------------------------------- 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) -- 1.7.9.1