linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Yoknis <mike.yoknis@hp.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mmarek@suse.cz, tglx@linutronix.de,
	hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de, sam@ravnborg.org,
	minchan@kernel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
	mhocko@suse.cz, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memmap_init_zone() performance improvement
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:53:18 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350676398.1169.6.camel@MikesLinux.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349794597.29752.10.camel@MikesLinux.fc.hp.com>

On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 08:56 -0600, Mike Yoknis wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 16:16 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 08:56:14AM -0600, Mike Yoknis wrote:
> > > memmap_init_zone() loops through every Page Frame Number (pfn),
> > > including pfn values that are within the gaps between existing
> > > memory sections.  The unneeded looping will become a boot
> > > performance issue when machines configure larger memory ranges
> > > that will contain larger and more numerous gaps.
> > > 
> > > The code will skip across invalid sections to reduce the
> > > number of loops executed.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Yoknis <mike.yoknis@hp.com>
> > 
> > I do not see the need for
> > the additional complexity unless you can show it makes a big difference
> > to boot times.
> > 
> 
> Mel,
> 
> Let me pass along the numbers I have.  We have what we call an
> "architectural simulator".  It is a computer program that pretends that
> it is a computer system.  We use it to test the firmware before real
> hardware is available.  We have booted Linux on our simulator.  As you
> would expect it takes longer to boot on the simulator than it does on
> real hardware.
> 
> With my patch - boot time 41 minutes
> Without patch - boot time 94 minutes
> 
> These numbers do not scale linearly to real hardware.  But indicate to
> me a place where Linux can be improved.
> 
> Mike Yoknis
> 
Mel,
I finally got access to prototype hardware.  
It is a relatively small machine with only 64GB of RAM.
 
I put in a time measurement by reading the TSC register.
I booted both with and without my patch -
 
Without patch -
[    0.000000]   Normal zone: 13400064 pages, LIFO batch:31
[    0.000000] memmap_init_zone() enter 1404184834218
[    0.000000] memmap_init_zone() exit  1411174884438  diff = 6990050220
 
With patch -
[    0.000000]   Normal zone: 13400064 pages, LIFO batch:31
[    0.000000] memmap_init_zone() enter 1555530050778
[    0.000000] memmap_init_zone() exit  1559379204643  diff = 3849153865
 
This shows that without the patch the routine spends 45% 
of its time spinning unnecessarily.
 
Mike Yoknis

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-19 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-03 14:56 [PATCH] mm: memmap_init_zone() performance improvement Mike Yoknis
2012-10-06 23:59 ` Ni zhan Chen
2012-10-06 23:59   ` Ni zhan Chen
2012-10-08 15:16 ` Mel Gorman
2012-10-08 15:16   ` Mel Gorman
2012-10-09  0:42   ` Ni zhan Chen
2012-10-09  0:42     ` Ni zhan Chen
2012-10-09 14:56   ` Mike Yoknis
2012-10-19 19:53     ` Mike Yoknis [this message]
2012-10-20  8:29       ` Mel Gorman
2012-10-20  8:29         ` Mel Gorman
2012-10-24 15:47         ` Mike Yoknis
2012-10-24 15:47           ` Mike Yoknis
2012-10-25  9:44           ` Mel Gorman
2012-10-26 22:47             ` [PATCH v2] " Mike Yoknis
2012-10-26 22:47               ` Mike Yoknis
2012-10-30 22:31               ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-30 22:31                 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-30 15:14         ` [PATCH] " Dave Hansen
2012-10-30 15:14           ` Dave Hansen
2012-11-06 16:03           ` Mike Yoknis
2012-11-06 16:03             ` Mike Yoknis
2012-12-18 23:03             ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1350676398.1169.6.camel@MikesLinux.fc.hp.com \
    --to=mike.yoknis@hp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).