From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
robclark@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mutex: add support for reservation style locks, v2
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:54:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365094476.2609.123.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130404133123.GW2228@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 15:31 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Well, it was a good read and I'm rather happy that we agree on the
> ww_ctx
> thing (whatever it's called in the end), even though we have slightly
> different reasons for it.
Yeah, I tried various weirdness to get out from under it, but the whole
progress/fairness thing made it rather hard. Ideally you'd be able to
use some existing scheduler state since its the same goal, but the
whole wakeup-retry muck makes that hard.
> I don't really have a useful idea to make the retry handling for users
> more rusty-compliant though, and I'm still unhappy with all current
> naming
> proposals ;-)
Ah, naming,.. yeah I'm not too terribly attached to most of them. I
just want to avoid something that's reasonably well known to mean
something different.
Furthermore, since we use the wound/wait symmetry breaking it would
make sense for that to appear somewhere in the name.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-04 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-28 10:24 [PATCH v2 1/3] arch: make __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval return whether fastpath succeeded or not Maarten Lankhorst
2013-02-28 10:24 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2013-02-28 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mutex: add support for reservation style locks, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2013-02-28 10:25 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2013-04-02 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-02 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-02 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-02 11:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-02 14:57 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2013-04-02 14:57 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2013-04-02 16:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-02 17:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-02 17:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-02 17:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-02 17:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-04 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-04 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-04 13:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-04 16:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-04 16:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-04 16:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-04 16:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-04 16:59 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-09 22:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-10 8:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-10 8:27 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-04 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-04 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-04 16:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-04 16:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-09 22:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-10 9:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-17 19:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-18 17:37 ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-04-04 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-04 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-04 16:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-04 16:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-04 16:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-04 16:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-04 20:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-04 16:54 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-04-04 16:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-04 16:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-04 16:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-08 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-08 11:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-08 11:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-10 10:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-09 22:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-10 7:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-09 22:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-02 15:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-04-02 11:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-02 11:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-28 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] reservation: Add tests to lib/locking-selftest.c. v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2013-03-09 12:06 ` [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH v2 1/3] arch: make __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval return whether fastpath succeeded or not Francesco Lavra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1365094476.2609.123.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=robclark@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).