From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
"Aswin Chandramouleeswaran\"" <aswin@hp.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/4] qrwlock: Use the mcs_spinlock helper functions for MCS queuing
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:17:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1383585440-4391-5-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383585440-4391-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com>
There is a pending patch in the rwsem patch series that adds a generic
MCS locking helper functions to do MCS-style locking. This patch
will enable the queue rwlock to use that generic MCS lock/unlock
primitives for internal queuing. This patch should only be merged
after the merging of that generic MCS locking patch.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
---
include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h | 7 +--
lib/qrwlock.c | 140 +++++++++++++----------------------------
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
index 78ad4a5..014e6e9 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
@@ -54,10 +54,7 @@ typedef u64 __nrcpupair_t;
* QRW_READER_BIAS to the rw field to increment the reader count won't
* disturb the writer and the fair fields.
*/
-struct qrwnode {
- struct qrwnode *next;
- bool wait; /* Waiting flag */
-};
+struct mcs_spinlock;
typedef struct qrwlock {
union qrwcnts {
@@ -74,7 +71,7 @@ typedef struct qrwlock {
};
__nrcpupair_t rw; /* Reader/writer number pair */
} cnts;
- struct qrwnode *waitq; /* Tail of waiting queue */
+ struct mcs_spinlock *waitq; /* Tail of waiting queue */
} arch_rwlock_t;
/*
diff --git a/lib/qrwlock.c b/lib/qrwlock.c
index a85b9e1..6817853 100644
--- a/lib/qrwlock.c
+++ b/lib/qrwlock.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include <linux/hardirq.h>
+#include <linux/mcs_spinlock.h>
#include <asm-generic/qrwlock.h>
/*
@@ -46,87 +47,16 @@
*/
/**
- * wait_in_queue - Add to queue and wait until it is at the head
- * @lock: Pointer to queue rwlock structure
- * @node: Node pointer to be added to the queue
- *
- * The use of smp_wmb() is to make sure that the other CPUs see the change
- * ASAP.
- */
-static __always_inline void
-wait_in_queue(struct qrwlock *lock, struct qrwnode *node)
-{
- struct qrwnode *prev;
-
- node->next = NULL;
- node->wait = true;
- prev = xchg(&lock->waitq, node);
- if (prev) {
- prev->next = node;
- smp_wmb();
- /*
- * Wait until the waiting flag is off
- */
- while (ACCESS_ONCE(node->wait))
- cpu_relax();
- }
-}
-
-/**
- * signal_next - Signal the next one in queue to be at the head
- * @lock: Pointer to queue rwlock structure
- * @node: Node pointer to the current head of queue
- */
-static __always_inline void
-signal_next(struct qrwlock *lock, struct qrwnode *node)
-{
- struct qrwnode *next;
-
- /*
- * Try to notify the next node first without disturbing the cacheline
- * of the lock. If that fails, check to see if it is the last node
- * and so should clear the wait queue.
- */
- next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next);
- if (likely(next))
- goto notify_next;
-
- /*
- * Clear the wait queue if it is the last node
- */
- if ((ACCESS_ONCE(lock->waitq) == node) &&
- (cmpxchg(&lock->waitq, node, NULL) == node))
- return;
- /*
- * Wait until the next one in queue set up the next field
- */
- while (likely(!(next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next))))
- cpu_relax();
- /*
- * The next one in queue is now at the head
- */
-notify_next:
- barrier();
- ACCESS_ONCE(next->wait) = false;
- smp_wmb();
-}
-
-/**
* rspin_until_writer_unlock - inc reader count & spin until writer is gone
* @lock: Pointer to queue rwlock structure
+ * @cnts: Queue read/write lock counts structure
*
* In interrupt context or at the head of the queue, the reader will just
* increment the reader count & wait until the writer releases the lock.
*/
static __always_inline void
-rspin_until_writer_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock, int inc)
+rspin_until_writer_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock, union qrwcnts cnts)
{
- union qrwcnts cnts;
-
- if (inc)
- cnts.rw = xadd(&lock->cnts.rw, QRW_READER_BIAS);
- else
- cnts.rw = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->cnts.rw);
while (cnts.writer == QW_LOCKED) {
cpu_relax();
cnts.rw = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->cnts.rw);
@@ -139,7 +69,7 @@ rspin_until_writer_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock, int inc)
*/
void queue_read_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
{
- struct qrwnode node;
+ struct mcs_spinlock node;
union qrwcnts cnts;
/*
@@ -150,7 +80,8 @@ void queue_read_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
* Readers in interrupt context will spin until the lock is
* available without waiting in the queue.
*/
- rspin_until_writer_unlock(lock, 0);
+ cnts.rw = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->cnts.rw);
+ rspin_until_writer_unlock(lock, cnts);
return;
}
cnts.rw = xadd(&lock->cnts.rw, -QRW_READER_BIAS);
@@ -158,7 +89,7 @@ void queue_read_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
/*
* Put the reader into the wait queue
*/
- wait_in_queue(lock, &node);
+ mcs_spin_lock(&lock->waitq, &node);
/*
* At the head of the wait queue now, try to increment the reader
@@ -172,12 +103,36 @@ void queue_read_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
while (ACCESS_ONCE(lock->cnts.writer))
cpu_relax();
}
- rspin_until_writer_unlock(lock, 1);
- signal_next(lock, &node);
+ /*
+ * Increment reader count & wait until writer unlock
+ */
+ cnts.rw = xadd(&lock->cnts.rw, QRW_READER_BIAS);
+ rspin_until_writer_unlock(lock, cnts);
+ mcs_spin_unlock(&lock->waitq, &node);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(queue_read_lock_slowpath);
/**
+ * _write_trylock - try to acquire a write lock
+ * @lock : Pointer to queue rwlock structure
+ * @old : Old value of the qrwcnts
+ * @new : New value of the qrwcnts
+ * Return: 1 if lock acquired, 0 otherwise
+ *
+ * Put old & new as function arguments can force the compiler to generate
+ * better code with less stack memory access.
+ */
+static __always_inline int _write_trylock(struct qrwlock *lock,
+ union qrwcnts old, union qrwcnts new)
+{
+ new.rw = old.rw;
+ new.writer = QW_LOCKED;
+ if (likely(cmpxchg(&lock->cnts.rw, old.rw, new.rw) == old.rw))
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
* queue_write_3step_lock - acquire write lock in 3 steps
* @lock : Pointer to queue rwlock structure
* Return: 1 if lock acquired, 0 otherwise
@@ -194,33 +149,24 @@ static __always_inline int queue_write_3step_lock(struct qrwlock *lock)
union qrwcnts old, new;
old.rw = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->cnts.rw);
+ new.rw = 0;
/* Step 1 */
- if (!old.writer & !old.readers) {
- new.rw = old.rw;
- new.writer = QW_LOCKED;
- if (likely(cmpxchg(&lock->cnts.rw, old.rw, new.rw) == old.rw))
- return 1;
- }
+ if (!old.writer && !old.readers && _write_trylock(lock, old, new))
+ return 1;
/* Step 2 */
if (old.writer || (cmpxchg(&lock->cnts.writer, 0, QW_WAITING) != 0))
return 0;
/* Step 3 */
- while (true) {
+ cpu_relax();
+ old.rw = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->cnts.rw);
+ while (old.readers || !_write_trylock(lock, old, new)) {
cpu_relax();
old.rw = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->cnts.rw);
- if (!old.readers) {
- new.rw = old.rw;
- new.writer = QW_LOCKED;
- if (likely(cmpxchg(&lock->cnts.rw, old.rw, new.rw)
- == old.rw))
- return 1;
- }
}
- /* Should never reach here */
- return 0;
+ return 1;
}
/**
@@ -229,12 +175,12 @@ static __always_inline int queue_write_3step_lock(struct qrwlock *lock)
*/
void queue_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
{
- struct qrwnode node;
+ struct mcs_spinlock node;
/*
* Put the writer into the wait queue
*/
- wait_in_queue(lock, &node);
+ mcs_spin_lock(&lock->waitq, &node);
/*
* At the head of the wait queue now, call queue_write_3step_lock()
@@ -242,6 +188,6 @@ void queue_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
*/
while (!queue_write_3step_lock(lock))
cpu_relax();
- signal_next(lock, &node);
+ mcs_spin_unlock(&lock->waitq, &node);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(queue_write_lock_slowpath);
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-04 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-04 17:17 [PATCH v5 0/4] qrwlock: Introducing a queue read/write lock implementation Waiman Long
2013-11-04 17:17 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] qrwlock: A " Waiman Long
2013-11-04 17:17 ` Waiman Long
2013-11-08 21:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-08 22:36 ` Waiman Long
2013-11-08 22:36 ` Waiman Long
2013-11-08 23:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-09 3:05 ` Waiman Long
2013-11-04 17:17 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] qrwlock x86: Enable x86 to use queue read/write lock Waiman Long
2013-11-04 17:17 ` Waiman Long
2013-11-04 17:17 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] qrwlock: Enable fair " Waiman Long
2013-11-04 17:17 ` Waiman Long
2013-11-04 17:17 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2013-11-04 17:17 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] qrwlock: Use the mcs_spinlock helper functions for MCS queuing Waiman Long
2013-11-08 21:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-08 22:42 ` Waiman Long
2013-11-09 1:17 ` Tim Chen
2013-11-09 3:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1383585440-4391-5-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--to=waiman.long@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).