From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
Julien Tinnes <jln@chromium.org>,
David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"David A. Long" <dave.long@lina>
Subject: [PATCH v6 4/9] seccomp: move no_new_privs into seccomp
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:01:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1402441314-7447-5-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402441314-7447-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org>
Since seccomp transitions between threads requires updates to the
no_new_privs flag to be atomic, changes must be atomic. This moves the nnp
flag into the seccomp field as a separate unsigned long for atomic access.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
---
fs/exec.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/sched.h | 13 ++++++++++---
include/linux/seccomp.h | 8 +++++++-
kernel/seccomp.c | 2 +-
kernel/sys.c | 4 ++--
security/apparmor/domain.c | 4 ++--
6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 238b7aa26f68..614fcb993739 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@ static void check_unsafe_exec(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
* This isn't strictly necessary, but it makes it harder for LSMs to
* mess up.
*/
- if (current->no_new_privs)
+ if (task_no_new_privs(current))
bprm->unsafe |= LSM_UNSAFE_NO_NEW_PRIVS;
t = p;
@@ -1271,7 +1271,7 @@ int prepare_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
bprm->cred->egid = current_egid();
if (!(bprm->file->f_path.mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOSUID) &&
- !current->no_new_privs &&
+ !task_no_new_privs(current) &&
kuid_has_mapping(bprm->cred->user_ns, inode->i_uid) &&
kgid_has_mapping(bprm->cred->user_ns, inode->i_gid)) {
/* Set-uid? */
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index ea74596014a2..50b41affb7b1 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1307,9 +1307,6 @@ struct task_struct {
* execve */
unsigned in_iowait:1;
- /* task may not gain privileges */
- unsigned no_new_privs:1;
-
/* Revert to default priority/policy when forking */
unsigned sched_reset_on_fork:1;
unsigned sched_contributes_to_load:1;
@@ -2525,6 +2522,16 @@ static inline void task_unlock(struct task_struct *p)
spin_unlock(&p->alloc_lock);
}
+static inline bool task_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ return test_bit(SECCOMP_FLAG_NO_NEW_PRIVS, &p->seccomp.flags);
+}
+
+static inline void task_set_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ set_bit(SECCOMP_FLAG_NO_NEW_PRIVS, &p->seccomp.flags);
+}
+
extern struct sighand_struct *__lock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk,
unsigned long *flags);
diff --git a/include/linux/seccomp.h b/include/linux/seccomp.h
index 9ff98b4bfe2e..6a5e2d0ec912 100644
--- a/include/linux/seccomp.h
+++ b/include/linux/seccomp.h
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
#include <uapi/linux/seccomp.h>
+#define SECCOMP_FLAG_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0 /* task may not gain privs */
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP
#include <linux/thread_info.h>
@@ -16,6 +18,7 @@ struct seccomp_filter;
* system calls available to a process.
* @filter: must always point to a valid seccomp-filter or NULL as it is
* accessed without locking during system call entry.
+ * @flags: flags under task->sighand->siglock lock
*
* @filter must only be accessed from the context of current as there
* is no read locking.
@@ -23,6 +26,7 @@ struct seccomp_filter;
struct seccomp {
int mode;
struct seccomp_filter *filter;
+ unsigned long flags;
};
extern int __secure_computing(int);
@@ -51,7 +55,9 @@ static inline int seccomp_mode(struct seccomp *s)
#include <linux/errno.h>
-struct seccomp { };
+struct seccomp {
+ unsigned long flags;
+};
struct seccomp_filter { };
static inline int secure_computing(int this_syscall) { return 0; }
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index 33655302b658..7ec99b99e400 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static struct seccomp_filter *seccomp_prepare_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog)
* This avoids scenarios where unprivileged tasks can affect the
* behavior of privileged children.
*/
- if (!current->no_new_privs &&
+ if (!task_no_new_privs(current) &&
security_capable_noaudit(current_cred(), current_user_ns(),
CAP_SYS_ADMIN) != 0)
return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
index 66a751ebf9d9..ce8129192a26 100644
--- a/kernel/sys.c
+++ b/kernel/sys.c
@@ -1990,12 +1990,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(prctl, int, option, unsigned long, arg2, unsigned long, arg3,
if (arg2 != 1 || arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
return -EINVAL;
- current->no_new_privs = 1;
+ task_set_no_new_privs(current);
break;
case PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS:
if (arg2 || arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
return -EINVAL;
- return current->no_new_privs ? 1 : 0;
+ return task_no_new_privs(current) ? 1 : 0;
case PR_GET_THP_DISABLE:
if (arg2 || arg3 || arg4 || arg5)
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/security/apparmor/domain.c b/security/apparmor/domain.c
index 452567d3a08e..d97cba3e3849 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/domain.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/domain.c
@@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ int aa_change_hat(const char *hats[], int count, u64 token, bool permtest)
* There is no exception for unconfined as change_hat is not
* available.
*/
- if (current->no_new_privs)
+ if (task_no_new_privs(current))
return -EPERM;
/* released below */
@@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ int aa_change_profile(const char *ns_name, const char *hname, bool onexec,
* no_new_privs is set because this aways results in a reduction
* of permissions.
*/
- if (current->no_new_privs && !unconfined(profile)) {
+ if (task_no_new_privs(current) && !unconfined(profile)) {
put_cred(cred);
return -EPERM;
}
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-10 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-10 23:01 [PATCH v6 0/9] seccomp: add thread sync ability Kees Cook
2014-06-10 23:01 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] seccomp: create internal mode-setting function Kees Cook
2014-06-10 23:01 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] seccomp: split filter prep from check and apply Kees Cook
2014-06-10 23:01 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] seccomp: introduce writer locking Kees Cook
2014-06-10 23:01 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2014-06-10 23:01 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] seccomp: split mode set routines Kees Cook
2014-06-10 23:01 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] seccomp: add "seccomp" syscall Kees Cook
2014-06-10 23:01 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] seccomp: implement SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC Kees Cook
2014-06-10 23:01 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] ARM: add seccomp syscall Kees Cook
2014-06-10 23:01 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] MIPS: " Kees Cook
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-06-11 3:25 [PATCH v6 0/9] seccomp: add thread sync ability Kees Cook
2014-06-11 3:25 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] seccomp: move no_new_privs into seccomp Kees Cook
2014-06-11 3:25 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1402441314-7447-5-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=dave.long@lina \
--cc=drysdale@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=jln@chromium.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).