linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Paul.Mundt@huawei.com, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Wuyun <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>,
	arnab.basu@freescale.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 05/11] PCI/MSI: Move populate_msi_sysfs() out of msi_capability_init()
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:08:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1406344128-27055-6-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406344128-27055-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>

Because some Non-PCI devices don't need to create sysfs object,
so move populate_msi_sysfs() out of generic MSI function
msi/x_capability_init().

Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/pci/msi.c |   31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index 116383c..21b16e0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -646,13 +646,6 @@ static int msi_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	ret = populate_msi_sysfs(dev);
-	if (ret) {
-		msi_mask_irq(entry, mask, ~mask);
-		free_msi_irqs(dev);
-		return ret;
-	}
-
 	/* Set MSI enabled bits	 */
 	pci_intx_for_msi(dev, 0);
 	msi_set_enable(dev, 1);
@@ -760,10 +753,6 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *base,
 
 	msix_program_entries(dev, entries);
 
-	ret = populate_msi_sysfs(dev);
-	if (ret)
-		goto out_free;
-
 	/* Set MSI-X enabled bits and unmask the function */
 	pci_intx_for_msi(dev, 0);
 	dev->msix_enabled = 1;
@@ -789,7 +778,6 @@ out_avail:
 			ret = avail;
 	}
 
-out_free:
 	free_msi_irqs(dev);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -939,7 +927,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_msix_vec_count);
 int pci_enable_msix(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msix_entry *entries, int nvec)
 {
 	int status, nr_entries;
-	int i, j;
+	int i, j, ret;
 	void __iomem *base;
 	u16 control;
 
@@ -980,6 +968,14 @@ int pci_enable_msix(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msix_entry *entries, int nvec)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	status = msix_capability_init(dev, base, entries, nvec);
+	if (!status) {
+		ret = populate_msi_sysfs(dev);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev->msix_enabled = 0;
+			pci_intx_for_msi(dev, 1);
+			free_msi_irqs(dev);
+		}
+	}
 	return status;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_enable_msix);
@@ -1109,6 +1105,15 @@ int pci_enable_msi_range(struct pci_dev *dev, int minvec, int maxvec)
 		}
 	} while (rc);
 
+	rc = populate_msi_sysfs(dev);
+	if (rc) {
+		msi_set_enable(dev, 0);
+		pci_intx_for_msi(dev, 1);
+		dev->msi_enabled = 0;
+		free_msi_irqs(dev);
+		return rc;
+	}
+
 	return nvec;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_enable_msi_range);
-- 
1.7.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>, Wuyun <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Paul.Mundt@huawei.com,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnab.basu@freescale.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 05/11] PCI/MSI: Move populate_msi_sysfs() out of msi_capability_init()
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:08:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1406344128-27055-6-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20140726030842.S1j54diNqfYPOufISll9MIpDF7n87t1KhdxrU0-KjdU@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406344128-27055-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>

Because some Non-PCI devices don't need to create sysfs object,
so move populate_msi_sysfs() out of generic MSI function
msi/x_capability_init().

Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/pci/msi.c |   31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index 116383c..21b16e0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -646,13 +646,6 @@ static int msi_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	ret = populate_msi_sysfs(dev);
-	if (ret) {
-		msi_mask_irq(entry, mask, ~mask);
-		free_msi_irqs(dev);
-		return ret;
-	}
-
 	/* Set MSI enabled bits	 */
 	pci_intx_for_msi(dev, 0);
 	msi_set_enable(dev, 1);
@@ -760,10 +753,6 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *base,
 
 	msix_program_entries(dev, entries);
 
-	ret = populate_msi_sysfs(dev);
-	if (ret)
-		goto out_free;
-
 	/* Set MSI-X enabled bits and unmask the function */
 	pci_intx_for_msi(dev, 0);
 	dev->msix_enabled = 1;
@@ -789,7 +778,6 @@ out_avail:
 			ret = avail;
 	}
 
-out_free:
 	free_msi_irqs(dev);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -939,7 +927,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_msix_vec_count);
 int pci_enable_msix(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msix_entry *entries, int nvec)
 {
 	int status, nr_entries;
-	int i, j;
+	int i, j, ret;
 	void __iomem *base;
 	u16 control;
 
@@ -980,6 +968,14 @@ int pci_enable_msix(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msix_entry *entries, int nvec)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	status = msix_capability_init(dev, base, entries, nvec);
+	if (!status) {
+		ret = populate_msi_sysfs(dev);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev->msix_enabled = 0;
+			pci_intx_for_msi(dev, 1);
+			free_msi_irqs(dev);
+		}
+	}
 	return status;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_enable_msix);
@@ -1109,6 +1105,15 @@ int pci_enable_msi_range(struct pci_dev *dev, int minvec, int maxvec)
 		}
 	} while (rc);
 
+	rc = populate_msi_sysfs(dev);
+	if (rc) {
+		msi_set_enable(dev, 0);
+		pci_intx_for_msi(dev, 1);
+		dev->msi_enabled = 0;
+		free_msi_irqs(dev);
+		return rc;
+	}
+
 	return nvec;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_enable_msi_range);
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-26  3:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-26  3:08 [RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] PCI/MSI: Use pci_dev->msi_cap instead of msi_desc->msi_attrib.pos Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08   ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] PCI/MSI: Use new MSI type macro instead of PCI MSI flags Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08   ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] PCI/MSI: Refactor pci_dev_msi_enabled() Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08   ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-05 22:35   ` Stuart Yoder
2014-08-05 22:35     ` Stuart Yoder
2014-08-06  1:23     ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-06  1:23       ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20  5:57   ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20  5:57     ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20  6:30     ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20  6:30       ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] PCI/MSI: Move MSIX table address mapping out of msix_capability_init Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08   ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` Yijing Wang [this message]
2014-07-26  3:08   ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] PCI/MSI: Move populate_msi_sysfs() out of msi_capability_init() Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] PCI/MSI: Save MSI irq in PCI MSI layer Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08   ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] PCI/MSI: Mask MSI-X entry in msix_setup_entries() Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08   ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] PCI/MSI: Introduce new struct msi_irqs and struct msi_ops Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08   ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] PCI/MSI: refactor PCI MSI driver Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08   ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20  6:06   ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20  6:06     ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20  6:34     ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20  6:34       ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] PCI/MSI: Split the generic MSI code into new file Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08   ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20  6:18   ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20  6:18     ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20  6:43     ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20  6:43       ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] x86/MSI: Refactor x86 MSI code Yijing Wang
2014-07-26  3:08   ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20  6:20   ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20  6:20     ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20  7:01     ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-29 14:08 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-29 14:08   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-30  2:45   ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30  2:45     ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-30  6:47     ` Jiang Liu
2014-07-30  6:47       ` Jiang Liu
2014-07-30  7:20       ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-01 13:16         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-01 13:16           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-04  3:32           ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-04  3:32             ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-04 14:45             ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-05  2:20               ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-05  2:20                 ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-01 13:52     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-01 13:52       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-04  6:43       ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-04  6:43         ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-04 14:59         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-04 14:59           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-05  2:12           ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-05  2:12             ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-01 10:27 ` arnab.basu
2014-08-04  3:03   ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-04  3:03     ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20  5:44     ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20  5:44       ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20  6:28       ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20  6:28         ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-20  7:41         ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20  7:41           ` Bharat.Bhushan
2014-08-20  7:55           ` Yijing Wang
2014-09-03  7:15           ` Yijing Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1406344128-27055-6-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=Paul.Mundt@huawei.com \
    --cc=arnab.basu@freescale.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
    --cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wuyun.wu@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).