From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] UAPI: perf fixes Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:12:30 +0000 Message-ID: <14097.1352805150@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <14071.1352805065@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1378.1352379110@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26812 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752862Ab2KMLMu (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 06:12:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <14071.1352805065@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Josh Boyer , acme@ghostprotocols.net, mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de, namhyung@gmail.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, paulus@samba.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org David Howells wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > > > This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with: > > Hmmm... Getting my hands on an ARM or ppc/ppc64 box running Fedora is a > problem, and as far as I know, this needs to be built natively or maybe > cross-compiled with a full environment (including graphics libs). Actually, having said that, it doesn't need to run Fedora specifically - only a sufficiently recent environment that it can build a cutting-edge kernel. David