* Re: [PATCH] unicore32: Remove unneeded Kconfig entry NO_IOPORT_MAP
[not found] <1411586033.19525.34.camel@x220>
@ 2014-09-28 1:49 ` Xuetao Guan
2014-09-28 1:49 ` Xuetao Guan
2014-09-29 9:00 ` Paul Bolle
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Xuetao Guan @ 2014-09-28 1:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Bolle; +Cc: Guan Xuetao, linux-kernel, linux-arch
Sorry for late reply.
I checked this config, and it's only used for HAS_IOPORT_MAP in lib/Kconfig
Sure, removing it means no different for .config file.
I think a better way is reserving it or moving it into arch/Kconfig
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Xuetao Guan
----- Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> 写道:
> Architectures only need a Kconfig entry for NO_IOPORT_MAP if it is
> possible that its value will be 'y'. For unicore32 its value will always
> be 'n', making it pointless. Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
> ---
> Tested by playing with arch/unicore32/configs/unicore32_defconfig. This
> patch made no difference whatsoever to the generated .config file.
> Please note that it has
> CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT_MAP=y
>
> set after invoking "make oldconfig" both before and after this patch.
>
> arch/unicore32/Kconfig | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/unicore32/Kconfig b/arch/unicore32/Kconfig
> index 928237a7b9ca..2322cc87e7cb 100644
> --- a/arch/unicore32/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/unicore32/Kconfig
> @@ -27,9 +27,6 @@ config UNICORE32
> config GENERIC_CSUM
> def_bool y
>
> -config NO_IOPORT_MAP
> - bool
> -
> config STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
> def_bool y
>
> --
> 1.9.3
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] unicore32: Remove unneeded Kconfig entry NO_IOPORT_MAP
2014-09-28 1:49 ` [PATCH] unicore32: Remove unneeded Kconfig entry NO_IOPORT_MAP Xuetao Guan
@ 2014-09-28 1:49 ` Xuetao Guan
2014-09-29 9:00 ` Paul Bolle
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Xuetao Guan @ 2014-09-28 1:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Bolle; +Cc: Guan Xuetao, linux-kernel, linux-arch
Sorry for late reply.
I checked this config, and it's only used for HAS_IOPORT_MAP in lib/Kconfig
Sure, removing it means no different for .config file.
I think a better way is reserving it or moving it into arch/Kconfig
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Xuetao Guan
----- Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> 写道:
> Architectures only need a Kconfig entry for NO_IOPORT_MAP if it is
> possible that its value will be 'y'. For unicore32 its value will always
> be 'n', making it pointless. Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
> ---
> Tested by playing with arch/unicore32/configs/unicore32_defconfig. This
> patch made no difference whatsoever to the generated .config file.
> Please note that it has
> CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT_MAP=y
>
> set after invoking "make oldconfig" both before and after this patch.
>
> arch/unicore32/Kconfig | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/unicore32/Kconfig b/arch/unicore32/Kconfig
> index 928237a7b9ca..2322cc87e7cb 100644
> --- a/arch/unicore32/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/unicore32/Kconfig
> @@ -27,9 +27,6 @@ config UNICORE32
> config GENERIC_CSUM
> def_bool y
>
> -config NO_IOPORT_MAP
> - bool
> -
> config STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
> def_bool y
>
> --
> 1.9.3
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] unicore32: Remove unneeded Kconfig entry NO_IOPORT_MAP
2014-09-28 1:49 ` [PATCH] unicore32: Remove unneeded Kconfig entry NO_IOPORT_MAP Xuetao Guan
2014-09-28 1:49 ` Xuetao Guan
@ 2014-09-29 9:00 ` Paul Bolle
2014-10-01 14:38 ` 回复: " Xuetao Guan
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paul Bolle @ 2014-09-29 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xuetao Guan; +Cc: Guan Xuetao, linux-kernel, linux-arch
On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 09:49 +0800, Xuetao Guan wrote:
> Sorry for late reply.
You replied within four days. That's rather quick, actually.
> I checked this config, and it's only used for HAS_IOPORT_MAP in lib/Kconfig
> Sure, removing it means no different for .config file.
> I think a better way is reserving it
I'm not sure I get what you're saying here: what do mean with "reserving
it"?
> or moving it into arch/Kconfig
Without a (treewide) patch I find it hard to say whether that's worth
the trouble. But even if that move would be done, wouldn't it include
dropping this entry from arch/unicore32 anyway?
Paul Bolle
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* 回复: Re: [PATCH] unicore32: Remove unneeded Kconfig entry NO_IOPORT_MAP
2014-09-29 9:00 ` Paul Bolle
@ 2014-10-01 14:38 ` Xuetao Guan
2014-10-01 14:38 ` Xuetao Guan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Xuetao Guan @ 2014-10-01 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Bolle; +Cc: Guan Xuetao, linux-kernel, linux-arch
----- Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> 写道:
> On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 09:49 +0800, Xuetao Guan wrote:
> > Sorry for late reply.
>
> You replied within four days. That's rather quick, actually.
>
> > I checked this config, and it's only used for HAS_IOPORT_MAP in lib/Kconfig
> > Sure, removing it means no different for .config file.
> > I think a better way is reserving it
>
> I'm not sure I get what you're saying here: what do mean with "reserving
> it"?
I mean, it's better to keep the code unchanged.
>
> > or moving it into arch/Kconfig
>
> Without a (treewide) patch I find it hard to say whether that's worth
> the trouble. But even if that move would be done, wouldn't it include
> dropping this entry from arch/unicore32 anyway?
IMHO, this config could be removed from kernel code.
>
>
> Paul Bolle
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* 回复: Re: [PATCH] unicore32: Remove unneeded Kconfig entry NO_IOPORT_MAP
2014-10-01 14:38 ` 回复: " Xuetao Guan
@ 2014-10-01 14:38 ` Xuetao Guan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Xuetao Guan @ 2014-10-01 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Bolle; +Cc: Guan Xuetao, linux-kernel, linux-arch
----- Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> 写道:
> On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 09:49 +0800, Xuetao Guan wrote:
> > Sorry for late reply.
>
> You replied within four days. That's rather quick, actually.
>
> > I checked this config, and it's only used for HAS_IOPORT_MAP in lib/Kconfig
> > Sure, removing it means no different for .config file.
> > I think a better way is reserving it
>
> I'm not sure I get what you're saying here: what do mean with "reserving
> it"?
I mean, it's better to keep the code unchanged.
>
> > or moving it into arch/Kconfig
>
> Without a (treewide) patch I find it hard to say whether that's worth
> the trouble. But even if that move would be done, wouldn't it include
> dropping this entry from arch/unicore32 anyway?
IMHO, this config could be removed from kernel code.
>
>
> Paul Bolle
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-01 14:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1411586033.19525.34.camel@x220>
2014-09-28 1:49 ` [PATCH] unicore32: Remove unneeded Kconfig entry NO_IOPORT_MAP Xuetao Guan
2014-09-28 1:49 ` Xuetao Guan
2014-09-29 9:00 ` Paul Bolle
2014-10-01 14:38 ` 回复: " Xuetao Guan
2014-10-01 14:38 ` Xuetao Guan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).