From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] mm: Update generic gup implementation to handle hugepage directory Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 12:20:29 +1100 Message-ID: <1414459229.31711.0.camel@concordia> References: <1414233860-7683-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20141027160612.b7fd0b1cc9d82faeaa674940@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:60944 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753024AbaJ1BUb (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 21:20:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20141027160612.b7fd0b1cc9d82faeaa674940@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Steve Capper , Andrea Arcangeli , benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 16:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 25 Oct 2014 16:14:19 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" wrote: > > > Update generic gup implementation with powerpc specific details. > > On powerpc at pmd level we can have hugepte, normal pmd pointer > > or a pointer to the hugepage directory. > > I grabbed these. It would be better if they were merged into the powerpc > tree where they'll get more testing than in linux-next alone. Fine by me. Can I get an ack from you and/or someone else on CC? cheers