From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Hildenbrand Subject: [PATCH v1 08/15] futex: UP futex_atomic_op_inuser() relies on disabled preemption Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:52:13 +0200 Message-ID: <1431359540-32227-9-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1431359540-32227-1-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1431359540-32227-1-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@redhat.com, yang.shi@windriver.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, hughd@google.com, hocko@suse.cz, ralf@linux-mips.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, airlied@linux.ie, daniel.vetter@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org Let's explicitly disable/enable preemption in the !CONFIG_SMP version of futex_atomic_op_inuser, to prepare for pagefault_disable() not touching preemption anymore. Otherwise we might break mutual exclusion when relying on a get_user()/ put_user() implementation. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- include/asm-generic/futex.h | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/asm-generic/futex.h b/include/asm-generic/futex.h index b59b5a5..3586017 100644 --- a/include/asm-generic/futex.h +++ b/include/asm-generic/futex.h @@ -8,8 +8,7 @@ #ifndef CONFIG_SMP /* * The following implementation only for uniprocessor machines. - * For UP, it's relies on the fact that pagefault_disable() also disables - * preemption to ensure mutual exclusion. + * It relies on preempt_disable() ensuring mutual exclusion. * */ @@ -38,6 +37,7 @@ futex_atomic_op_inuser(int encoded_op, u32 __user *uaddr) if (encoded_op & (FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT << 28)) oparg = 1 << oparg; + preempt_disable(); pagefault_disable(); ret = -EFAULT; @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ futex_atomic_op_inuser(int encoded_op, u32 __user *uaddr) out_pagefault_enable: pagefault_enable(); + preempt_enable(); if (ret == 0) { switch (cmp) { -- 2.1.4 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.112]:52640 "EHLO e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752375AbbEKPwy (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2015 11:52:54 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 11 May 2015 16:52:52 +0100 From: David Hildenbrand Subject: [PATCH v1 08/15] futex: UP futex_atomic_op_inuser() relies on disabled preemption Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:52:13 +0200 Message-ID: <1431359540-32227-9-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1431359540-32227-1-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1431359540-32227-1-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@redhat.com, yang.shi@windriver.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, hughd@google.com, hocko@suse.cz, ralf@linux-mips.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, airlied@linux.ie, daniel.vetter@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com Message-ID: <20150511155213.G-m9FlJP_uO9lgwhMpKqifcgZpZ1CA3xO-XfKCouWYY@z> Let's explicitly disable/enable preemption in the !CONFIG_SMP version of futex_atomic_op_inuser, to prepare for pagefault_disable() not touching preemption anymore. Otherwise we might break mutual exclusion when relying on a get_user()/ put_user() implementation. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- include/asm-generic/futex.h | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/asm-generic/futex.h b/include/asm-generic/futex.h index b59b5a5..3586017 100644 --- a/include/asm-generic/futex.h +++ b/include/asm-generic/futex.h @@ -8,8 +8,7 @@ #ifndef CONFIG_SMP /* * The following implementation only for uniprocessor machines. - * For UP, it's relies on the fact that pagefault_disable() also disables - * preemption to ensure mutual exclusion. + * It relies on preempt_disable() ensuring mutual exclusion. * */ @@ -38,6 +37,7 @@ futex_atomic_op_inuser(int encoded_op, u32 __user *uaddr) if (encoded_op & (FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT << 28)) oparg = 1 << oparg; + preempt_disable(); pagefault_disable(); ret = -EFAULT; @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ futex_atomic_op_inuser(int encoded_op, u32 __user *uaddr) out_pagefault_enable: pagefault_enable(); + preempt_enable(); if (ret == 0) { switch (cmp) { -- 2.1.4