From: Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
deller@gmx.de, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
christian@brauner.io, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Dave.Martin@arm.com, mchehab+samsung@kernel.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.sh>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/signal: Signal-based pre-coredump notification
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 13:48:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14503a22-403e-3e39-cfd5-0b7a2f299986@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez27=w0oWFTYUeFc72-0DL0tf=NOzGCeZgtxFOePPPE5cA@mail.gmail.com>
Jann,
Thanks for the feedback. I will post a revised patch shortly.
On the related topic of "pdeath_signal", there are several inconsistencies
by preserving the flag across execve(2). The flag is cleared under several
conditions in different places. I will start a separate thread to see if
it can still be cleaned up.
PR_SET_PDEATHSIG (since Linux 2.1.57)
Set the parent death signal of the calling process to arg2
(either a signal value in the range 1..maxsig, or 0 to clear).
This is the signal that the calling process will get when its
parent dies. This value is cleared for the child of a fork(2)
and (since Linux 2.4.36 / 2.6.23) when executing a set-user-ID
or set-group-ID binary, or a binary that has associated
capabilities (see capabilities(7)). This value is preserved
across execve(2).
-- Enke
On 10/22/18 8:40 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 1:01 AM Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com> wrote:
>> Regarding the security considerations, it seems simpler and more secure to
>> just clear the "pre-coredump signal" cross execve(2), and let the new program
>> decide for itself. What do you think?
>
> I don't have a problem with these semantics.
>
> I could imagine someone being unhappy about the theoretical race
> window if they want to perform an in-place reexecution of a running
> service, but I don't know whether anyone actually cares about that.
>
>> Changes to prctl(2):
>>
>> DESCRIPTION
>>
>> PR_SET_PREDUMP_SIG (since Linux 4.20.x)
>> This allows the calling process to receive a signal (arg2,
>> if nonzero) from a child process prior to the coredump of
>> the child process. arg2 must be SIGUSR1, or SIGUSR2, or
>> SIGCHLD, or 0 (for clear).
>>
>> When SIGCHLD is specified, the signal code is set to
>> CLD_PREDUMP in such an SIGCHLD signal.
>>
>> The value of the pre-coredump signal is cleared across
>> execve(2), or for the child of a fork(2).
>>
>> PR_GET_PREDUMP_SIG (since Linux 4.20.x)
>> Return the current value of the pre-coredump signal for the
>> calling process, in the location pointed to by (int *) arg2.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
deller@gmx.de, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
christian@brauner.io, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Dave.Martin@arm.com, mchehab+samsung@kernel.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
guro@fb.com, Marcos Souza <marcos.souza.org@gmail.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
linux@dominikbrodowski.net, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Victor Kamensky <kamensky@cisco.com>,
xe-linux-external@cisco.com, sstrogin@cisco.com,
Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/signal: Signal-based pre-coredump notification
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 13:48:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14503a22-403e-3e39-cfd5-0b7a2f299986@cisco.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20181022204851.ffZ6hp6Dt4oGEtGPm3XoxpgJ6qOnFGRKMd2JIYwZ87k@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez27=w0oWFTYUeFc72-0DL0tf=NOzGCeZgtxFOePPPE5cA@mail.gmail.com>
Jann,
Thanks for the feedback. I will post a revised patch shortly.
On the related topic of "pdeath_signal", there are several inconsistencies
by preserving the flag across execve(2). The flag is cleared under several
conditions in different places. I will start a separate thread to see if
it can still be cleaned up.
PR_SET_PDEATHSIG (since Linux 2.1.57)
Set the parent death signal of the calling process to arg2
(either a signal value in the range 1..maxsig, or 0 to clear).
This is the signal that the calling process will get when its
parent dies. This value is cleared for the child of a fork(2)
and (since Linux 2.4.36 / 2.6.23) when executing a set-user-ID
or set-group-ID binary, or a binary that has associated
capabilities (see capabilities(7)). This value is preserved
across execve(2).
-- Enke
On 10/22/18 8:40 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 1:01 AM Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com> wrote:
>> Regarding the security considerations, it seems simpler and more secure to
>> just clear the "pre-coredump signal" cross execve(2), and let the new program
>> decide for itself. What do you think?
>
> I don't have a problem with these semantics.
>
> I could imagine someone being unhappy about the theoretical race
> window if they want to perform an in-place reexecution of a running
> service, but I don't know whether anyone actually cares about that.
>
>> Changes to prctl(2):
>>
>> DESCRIPTION
>>
>> PR_SET_PREDUMP_SIG (since Linux 4.20.x)
>> This allows the calling process to receive a signal (arg2,
>> if nonzero) from a child process prior to the coredump of
>> the child process. arg2 must be SIGUSR1, or SIGUSR2, or
>> SIGCHLD, or 0 (for clear).
>>
>> When SIGCHLD is specified, the signal code is set to
>> CLD_PREDUMP in such an SIGCHLD signal.
>>
>> The value of the pre-coredump signal is cleared across
>> execve(2), or for the child of a fork(2).
>>
>> PR_GET_PREDUMP_SIG (since Linux 4.20.x)
>> Return the current value of the pre-coredump signal for the
>> calling process, in the location pointed to by (int *) arg2.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-22 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 140+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-13 0:33 [PATCH] kernel/signal: Signal-based pre-coredump notification Enke Chen
2018-10-13 0:33 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-13 6:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-10-13 6:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-10-15 18:16 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 18:16 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 18:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-10-15 18:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-10-15 18:49 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 18:49 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 18:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-10-15 18:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-10-13 10:44 ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-13 10:44 ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-15 18:39 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 18:39 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-13 18:27 ` Jann Horn
2018-10-13 18:27 ` Jann Horn
2018-10-15 18:36 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 18:36 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 18:54 ` Jann Horn
2018-10-15 18:54 ` Jann Horn
2018-10-15 19:23 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 19:23 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-19 23:01 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-19 23:01 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-22 15:40 ` Jann Horn
2018-10-22 15:40 ` Jann Horn
2018-10-22 20:48 ` Enke Chen [this message]
2018-10-22 20:48 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 12:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-15 12:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-15 18:54 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 18:54 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 19:17 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 19:17 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 19:26 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 19:26 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-16 14:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-16 14:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-16 15:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-16 15:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-17 0:39 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-17 0:39 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 21:21 ` Alan Cox
2018-10-15 21:21 ` Alan Cox
2018-10-15 21:31 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 21:31 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 23:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-15 23:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-16 0:33 ` valdis.kletnieks
2018-10-16 0:33 ` valdis.kletnieks
2018-10-16 0:54 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-16 0:54 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-16 15:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-16 15:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-22 21:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Enke Chen
2018-10-22 21:09 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-23 9:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-23 9:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-23 19:43 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-23 19:43 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-23 21:40 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-23 21:40 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-24 13:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-24 13:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-24 21:56 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-24 21:56 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-24 5:39 ` [PATCH v3] " Enke Chen
2018-10-24 5:39 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-24 14:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-24 14:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-24 22:02 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-24 22:02 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-25 22:56 ` [PATCH v4] " Enke Chen
2018-10-25 22:56 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-26 8:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-26 8:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-26 22:23 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-26 22:23 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-29 11:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-29 11:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-29 21:08 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-29 21:08 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-29 22:31 ` [PATCH v5] " Enke Chen
2018-10-29 22:31 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-30 16:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-30 16:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-31 0:25 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-31 0:25 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-22 0:37 ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-22 0:37 ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-22 1:09 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-22 1:09 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-22 1:18 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-22 1:18 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-22 1:33 ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-22 1:33 ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-22 4:57 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-22 4:57 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-12 23:22 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-12 23:22 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-27 22:54 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] " Enke Chen
2018-11-27 22:54 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-28 15:19 ` Dave Martin
2018-11-28 15:19 ` Dave Martin
2018-11-29 0:15 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-29 0:15 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-29 11:55 ` Dave Martin
2018-11-29 11:55 ` Dave Martin
2018-11-30 0:27 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-30 0:27 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-30 12:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-11-30 12:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-05 6:47 ` Jann Horn
2018-12-05 6:47 ` Jann Horn
2018-12-04 22:37 ` Andrew Morton
2018-12-04 22:37 ` Andrew Morton
2018-12-06 17:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-06 17:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-25 22:56 ` [PATCH] selftests/prctl: selftest for pre-coredump signal notification Enke Chen
2018-10-25 22:56 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-27 22:54 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] " Enke Chen
2018-11-27 22:54 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-24 13:29 ` [PATCH v2] kernel/signal: Signal-based pre-coredump notification Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-24 13:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-24 23:50 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-24 23:50 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-25 12:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-25 12:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-25 20:45 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-25 20:45 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-25 21:24 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-25 21:24 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-25 21:56 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-25 21:56 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-25 13:45 ` Jann Horn
2018-10-25 13:45 ` Jann Horn
2018-10-25 20:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-25 20:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14503a22-403e-3e39-cfd5-0b7a2f299986@cisco.com \
--to=enkechen@cisco.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=khalid.aziz@oracle.com \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).