From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 01/10] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:41:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466178096-5623-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466178096-5623-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
The osq_lock() and osq_unlock() function may not provide the necessary
acquire and release barrier in some cases. This patch makes sure
that the proper barriers are provided when osq_lock() is successful
or when osq_unlock() is called.
The change on the unlock side is more for documentation purpose than
is actually needed.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
---
kernel/locking/osq_lock.c | 7 ++++++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
index 05a3785..d957b90 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
@@ -124,6 +124,11 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
cpu_relax_lowlatency();
}
+ /*
+ * Add an acquire memory barrier for pairing with the release barrier
+ * in unlock.
+ */
+ smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
return true;
unqueue:
@@ -198,7 +203,7 @@ void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
* Second most likely case.
*/
node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
- next = xchg(&node->next, NULL);
+ next = xchg_release(&node->next, NULL);
if (next) {
WRITE_ONCE(next->locked, 1);
return;
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-17 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-17 15:41 [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 00/10] locking/rwsem: Enable reader optimistic spinning Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2016-06-17 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 01/10] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 02/10] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 03/10] locking/rwsem: Make rwsem_spin_on_owner() return a tri-state value Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 04/10] locking/rwsem: Enable count-based spinning on reader Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 05/10] locking/rwsem: move down rwsem_down_read_failed function Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 06/10] locking/rwsem: Move common rwsem macros to asm-generic/rwsem_types.h Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 07/10] locking/rwsem: Change RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS for better disambiguation Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 08/10] locking/rwsem: Enable spinning readers Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 09/10] locking/rwsem: Enable reactivation of reader spinning Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 10/10] locking/rwsem: Add a boot parameter to reader spinning threshold Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1466178096-5623-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
--to=waiman.long@hpe.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=doug.hatch@hpe.com \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).