From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:32895 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752192AbXDKKtb (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:49:31 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20070410194834.b688ce55.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20070410194834.b688ce55.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200704062127.l36LRMA7019394@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <6632.1176200270@redhat.com> <1176257950.26372.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> Subject: Re: + expose-range-checking-functions-from-arch-specific.patch added to -mm tree Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:49:19 +0100 Message-ID: <14926.1176288559@redhat.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Rusty Russell , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, randy.dunlap@oracle.com List-ID: Andrew Morton wrote: > To me, "val_outside" means "true if the value is outside": > > bool val_outside(val, start, len) > { > return val < start || val > (start+len-1); > } > > that's what my function does. Seconded. Again, I would suggest calling it something like limit_check() or range_check(). David