From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: [PATCH 08/19] net/ipv4/tcp_input.c: Kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:07:18 -0700 Message-ID: <1508792849-3115-8-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20171023210408.GA2930@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171023210408.GA2930@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: mingo@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, snitzer@redhat.com, thor.thayer@linux.intel.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, davem@davemloft.net, shuah@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, tj@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org From: Mark Rutland For several reasons, it is desirable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in preference to ACCESS_ONCE(), and new code is expected to use one of the former. So far, there's been no reason to change most existing uses of ACCESS_ONCE(), as these aren't currently harmful. However, for some features it is necessary to instrument reads and writes separately, which is not possible with ACCESS_ONCE(). This distinction is critical to correct operation. It's possible to transform the bulk of kernel code using the Coccinelle script below. However, this doesn't handle comments, leaving references to ACCESS_ONCE() instances which have been removed. As a preparatory step, this patch converts the IPv4 TCP input code and comments to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() consistently. ---- virtual patch @ depends on patch @ expression E1, E2; @@ - ACCESS_ONCE(E1) = E2 + WRITE_ONCE(E1, E2) @ depends on patch @ expression E; @@ - ACCESS_ONCE(E) + READ_ONCE(E) ---- Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Cc: David S. Miller --- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index c5d7656beeee..133e7e4d94b5 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -815,12 +815,12 @@ static void tcp_update_pacing_rate(struct sock *sk) if (likely(tp->srtt_us)) do_div(rate, tp->srtt_us); - /* ACCESS_ONCE() is needed because sch_fq fetches sk_pacing_rate + /* WRITE_ONCE() is needed because sch_fq fetches sk_pacing_rate * without any lock. We want to make sure compiler wont store * intermediate values in this location. */ - ACCESS_ONCE(sk->sk_pacing_rate) = min_t(u64, rate, - sk->sk_max_pacing_rate); + WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_pacing_rate, min_t(u64, rate, + sk->sk_max_pacing_rate)); } /* Calculate rto without backoff. This is the second half of Van Jacobson's -- 2.5.2 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:57520 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751399AbdJWVHk (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:07:40 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9NL7J81031052 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:07:40 -0400 Received: from e12.ny.us.ibm.com (e12.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.202]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2dsjcg7eac-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:07:39 -0400 Received: from localhost by e12.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:07:38 -0400 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: [PATCH 08/19] net/ipv4/tcp_input.c: Kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:07:18 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20171023210408.GA2930@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20171023210408.GA2930@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: <1508792849-3115-8-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: mingo@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, snitzer@redhat.com, thor.thayer@linux.intel.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, davem@davemloft.net, shuah@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, tj@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Message-ID: <20171023210718.XLDQUh7jDr7PVMP8U355aLXWqGY7gZZFNhvsMy5QWTY@z> From: Mark Rutland For several reasons, it is desirable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in preference to ACCESS_ONCE(), and new code is expected to use one of the former. So far, there's been no reason to change most existing uses of ACCESS_ONCE(), as these aren't currently harmful. However, for some features it is necessary to instrument reads and writes separately, which is not possible with ACCESS_ONCE(). This distinction is critical to correct operation. It's possible to transform the bulk of kernel code using the Coccinelle script below. However, this doesn't handle comments, leaving references to ACCESS_ONCE() instances which have been removed. As a preparatory step, this patch converts the IPv4 TCP input code and comments to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() consistently. ---- virtual patch @ depends on patch @ expression E1, E2; @@ - ACCESS_ONCE(E1) = E2 + WRITE_ONCE(E1, E2) @ depends on patch @ expression E; @@ - ACCESS_ONCE(E) + READ_ONCE(E) ---- Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Cc: David S. Miller --- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index c5d7656beeee..133e7e4d94b5 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -815,12 +815,12 @@ static void tcp_update_pacing_rate(struct sock *sk) if (likely(tp->srtt_us)) do_div(rate, tp->srtt_us); - /* ACCESS_ONCE() is needed because sch_fq fetches sk_pacing_rate + /* WRITE_ONCE() is needed because sch_fq fetches sk_pacing_rate * without any lock. We want to make sure compiler wont store * intermediate values in this location. */ - ACCESS_ONCE(sk->sk_pacing_rate) = min_t(u64, rate, - sk->sk_max_pacing_rate); + WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_pacing_rate, min_t(u64, rate, + sk->sk_max_pacing_rate)); } /* Calculate rto without backoff. This is the second half of Van Jacobson's -- 2.5.2