From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
parri.andrea@gmail.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk, luc.maranget@inria.fr,
akiyks@gmail.com,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: [PATCH tools/memory-model 03/17] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Fix broken DMA vs MMIO ordering example
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:12:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1523895165-17576-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180416161209.GA6895@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
The section of memory-barriers.txt that describes the dma_Xmb() barriers
has an incorrect example claiming that a wmb() is required after writing
to coherent memory in order for those writes to be visible to a device
before a subsequent MMIO access using writel() can reach the device.
In fact, this ordering guarantee is provided (at significant cost on some
architectures such as arm and power) by writel, so the wmb() is not
necessary. writel_relaxed exists for cases where this ordering is not
required.
Fix the example and update the text to make this clearer.
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Reported-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 17 +++++++++--------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index 6dafc8085acc..34c1970908a5 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -1920,9 +1920,6 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions:
/* assign ownership */
desc->status = DEVICE_OWN;
- /* force memory to sync before notifying device via MMIO */
- wmb();
-
/* notify device of new descriptors */
writel(DESC_NOTIFY, doorbell);
}
@@ -1930,11 +1927,15 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions:
The dma_rmb() allows us guarantee the device has released ownership
before we read the data from the descriptor, and the dma_wmb() allows
us to guarantee the data is written to the descriptor before the device
- can see it now has ownership. The wmb() is needed to guarantee that the
- cache coherent memory writes have completed before attempting a write to
- the cache incoherent MMIO region.
-
- See Documentation/DMA-API.txt for more information on consistent memory.
+ can see it now has ownership. Note that, when using writel(), a prior
+ wmb() is not needed to guarantee that the cache coherent memory writes
+ have completed before writing to the MMIO region. The cheaper
+ writel_relaxed() does not provide this guarantee and must not be used
+ here.
+
+ See the subsection "Kernel I/O barrier effects" for more information on
+ relaxed I/O accessors and the Documentation/DMA-API.txt file for more
+ information on consistent memory.
MMIO WRITE BARRIER
--
2.5.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-16 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-16 16:12 [PATCH tools/memory-model 0/17] Memory-model changes Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 01/17] tools/memory-model: Rename link and rcu-path to rcu-link and rb Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 02/17] tools/memory-model: Redefine rb in terms of rcu-fence Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 03/17] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Fix broken DMA vs MMIO ordering example Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 04/17] locking: Document the semantics of spin_is_locked() Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 05/17] arm64: Remove smp_mb() from arch_spin_is_locked() Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 06/17] locking: Clean up comment and #ifndef for {,queued_}spin_is_locked() Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 07/17] kokr/doc: READ_ONCE() now implies smp_barrier_depends() Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 08/17] kokr/doc: De-emphasize smp_read_barrier_depends Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 09/17] kokr/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: Cross-reference "tools/memory-model/" Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 10/17] kokr/memory-barriers: Fix description of data dependency barriers Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 11/17] kokr/locking/memory-barriers: De-emphasize smp_read_barrier_depends() some more Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 12/17] tools/memory-model: Update required version of herdtools7 Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 13/17] memory-model: Fix cheat sheet typo Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 14/17] tools/memory-order: Improve key for SELF and SV Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 15/17] tools/memory-order: smp_mb__after_atomic() orders later RMW operations Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 16/17] tools/memory-model: Model 'smp_store_mb()' Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 17/17] tools/memory-model: Fix coding style in 'linux-kernel.def' Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1523895165-17576-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).