From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
parri.andrea@gmail.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk, luc.maranget@inria.fr,
akiyks@gmail.com,
Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tools/memory-model 04/17] locking: Document the semantics of spin_is_locked()
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:12:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1523895165-17576-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180416161209.GA6895@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
There appeared to be a certain, recurrent uncertainty concerning the
semantics of spin_is_locked(), likely a consequence of the fact that
this semantics remains undocumented or that it has been historically
linked to the (likewise unclear) semantics of spin_unlock_wait().
A recent auditing [1] of the callers of the primitive confirmed that
none of them are relying on particular ordering guarantees; document
this semantics by adding a docbook header to spin_is_locked(). Also,
describe behaviors specific to certain CONFIG_SMP=n builds.
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151981440005264&w=2
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152042843808540&w=2
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152043346110262&w=2
Co-Developed-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
Co-Developed-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Co-Developed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/spinlock.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h
index 4894d322d258..1e8a46435838 100644
--- a/include/linux/spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -380,6 +380,24 @@ static __always_inline int spin_trylock_irq(spinlock_t *lock)
raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(spinlock_check(lock), flags); \
})
+/**
+ * spin_is_locked() - Check whether a spinlock is locked.
+ * @lock: Pointer to the spinlock.
+ *
+ * This function is NOT required to provide any memory ordering
+ * guarantees; it could be used for debugging purposes or, when
+ * additional synchronization is needed, accompanied with other
+ * constructs (memory barriers) enforcing the synchronization.
+ *
+ * Returns: 1 if @lock is locked, 0 otherwise.
+ *
+ * Note that the function only tells you that the spinlock is
+ * seen to be locked, not that it is locked on your CPU.
+ *
+ * Further, on CONFIG_SMP=n builds with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=n,
+ * the return value is always 0 (see include/linux/spinlock_up.h).
+ * Therefore you should not rely heavily on the return value.
+ */
static __always_inline int spin_is_locked(spinlock_t *lock)
{
return raw_spin_is_locked(&lock->rlock);
--
2.5.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-16 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-16 16:12 [PATCH tools/memory-model 0/17] Memory-model changes Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 01/17] tools/memory-model: Rename link and rcu-path to rcu-link and rb Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 02/17] tools/memory-model: Redefine rb in terms of rcu-fence Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 03/17] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Fix broken DMA vs MMIO ordering example Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 04/17] locking: Document the semantics of spin_is_locked() Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 05/17] arm64: Remove smp_mb() from arch_spin_is_locked() Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 06/17] locking: Clean up comment and #ifndef for {,queued_}spin_is_locked() Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 07/17] kokr/doc: READ_ONCE() now implies smp_barrier_depends() Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 08/17] kokr/doc: De-emphasize smp_read_barrier_depends Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 09/17] kokr/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: Cross-reference "tools/memory-model/" Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 10/17] kokr/memory-barriers: Fix description of data dependency barriers Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 11/17] kokr/locking/memory-barriers: De-emphasize smp_read_barrier_depends() some more Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 12/17] tools/memory-model: Update required version of herdtools7 Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 13/17] memory-model: Fix cheat sheet typo Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 14/17] tools/memory-order: Improve key for SELF and SV Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 15/17] tools/memory-order: smp_mb__after_atomic() orders later RMW operations Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 16/17] tools/memory-model: Model 'smp_store_mb()' Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` [PATCH tools/memory-model 17/17] tools/memory-model: Fix coding style in 'linux-kernel.def' Paul E. McKenney
2018-04-16 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1523895165-17576-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).