From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: x86@kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH -tip v4 11/27] sh: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 16:04:54 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <152749109389.15132.10242898017621579145.stgit@devbox> (raw) In-Reply-To: <152749074878.15132.16693721906742461289.stgit@devbox> Remove arch dependent setjump/longjump functions and unused fields in kprobe_ctlblk for jprobes from arch/sh. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> --- arch/sh/include/asm/kprobes.h | 4 --- arch/sh/kernel/kprobes.c | 51 ----------------------------------------- 2 files changed, 55 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/kprobes.h index 85d8bcaa8493..6171682f7798 100644 --- a/arch/sh/include/asm/kprobes.h +++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/kprobes.h @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ struct kprobe; void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *); void kretprobe_trampoline(void); -void jprobe_return_end(void); /* Architecture specific copy of original instruction*/ struct arch_specific_insn { @@ -43,9 +42,6 @@ struct prev_kprobe { /* per-cpu kprobe control block */ struct kprobe_ctlblk { unsigned long kprobe_status; - unsigned long jprobe_saved_r15; - struct pt_regs jprobe_saved_regs; - kprobe_opcode_t jprobes_stack[MAX_STACK_SIZE]; struct prev_kprobe prev_kprobe; }; diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/sh/kernel/kprobes.c index 52a5e11247d1..2b5e58873b96 100644 --- a/arch/sh/kernel/kprobes.c +++ b/arch/sh/kernel/kprobes.c @@ -523,57 +523,6 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self, return ret; } -int __kprobes setjmp_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs) -{ - struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp); - unsigned long addr; - struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk(); - - kcb->jprobe_saved_regs = *regs; - kcb->jprobe_saved_r15 = regs->regs[15]; - addr = kcb->jprobe_saved_r15; - - /* - * TBD: As Linus pointed out, gcc assumes that the callee - * owns the argument space and could overwrite it, e.g. - * tailcall optimization. So, to be absolutely safe - * we also save and restore enough stack bytes to cover - * the argument area. - */ - memcpy(kcb->jprobes_stack, (kprobe_opcode_t *) addr, - MIN_STACK_SIZE(addr)); - - regs->pc = (unsigned long)(jp->entry); - - return 1; -} - -void __kprobes jprobe_return(void) -{ - asm volatile ("trapa #0x3a\n\t" "jprobe_return_end:\n\t" "nop\n\t"); -} - -int __kprobes longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs) -{ - struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk(); - unsigned long stack_addr = kcb->jprobe_saved_r15; - u8 *addr = (u8 *)regs->pc; - - if ((addr >= (u8 *)jprobe_return) && - (addr <= (u8 *)jprobe_return_end)) { - *regs = kcb->jprobe_saved_regs; - - memcpy((kprobe_opcode_t *)stack_addr, kcb->jprobes_stack, - MIN_STACK_SIZE(stack_addr)); - - kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS; - preempt_enable_no_resched(); - return 1; - } - - return 0; -} - static struct kprobe trampoline_p = { .addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)&kretprobe_trampoline, .pre_handler = trampoline_probe_handler
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: x86@kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH -tip v4 11/27] sh: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 16:04:54 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <152749109389.15132.10242898017621579145.stgit@devbox> (raw) Message-ID: <20180528070454.9SopdzS-4qsd413GXTB0AMr6cn-qDfnRB9DeuFiGKsw@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <152749074878.15132.16693721906742461289.stgit@devbox> Remove arch dependent setjump/longjump functions and unused fields in kprobe_ctlblk for jprobes from arch/sh. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> --- arch/sh/include/asm/kprobes.h | 4 --- arch/sh/kernel/kprobes.c | 51 ----------------------------------------- 2 files changed, 55 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/kprobes.h index 85d8bcaa8493..6171682f7798 100644 --- a/arch/sh/include/asm/kprobes.h +++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/kprobes.h @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ struct kprobe; void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *); void kretprobe_trampoline(void); -void jprobe_return_end(void); /* Architecture specific copy of original instruction*/ struct arch_specific_insn { @@ -43,9 +42,6 @@ struct prev_kprobe { /* per-cpu kprobe control block */ struct kprobe_ctlblk { unsigned long kprobe_status; - unsigned long jprobe_saved_r15; - struct pt_regs jprobe_saved_regs; - kprobe_opcode_t jprobes_stack[MAX_STACK_SIZE]; struct prev_kprobe prev_kprobe; }; diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/sh/kernel/kprobes.c index 52a5e11247d1..2b5e58873b96 100644 --- a/arch/sh/kernel/kprobes.c +++ b/arch/sh/kernel/kprobes.c @@ -523,57 +523,6 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self, return ret; } -int __kprobes setjmp_pre_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs) -{ - struct jprobe *jp = container_of(p, struct jprobe, kp); - unsigned long addr; - struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk(); - - kcb->jprobe_saved_regs = *regs; - kcb->jprobe_saved_r15 = regs->regs[15]; - addr = kcb->jprobe_saved_r15; - - /* - * TBD: As Linus pointed out, gcc assumes that the callee - * owns the argument space and could overwrite it, e.g. - * tailcall optimization. So, to be absolutely safe - * we also save and restore enough stack bytes to cover - * the argument area. - */ - memcpy(kcb->jprobes_stack, (kprobe_opcode_t *) addr, - MIN_STACK_SIZE(addr)); - - regs->pc = (unsigned long)(jp->entry); - - return 1; -} - -void __kprobes jprobe_return(void) -{ - asm volatile ("trapa #0x3a\n\t" "jprobe_return_end:\n\t" "nop\n\t"); -} - -int __kprobes longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs) -{ - struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk(); - unsigned long stack_addr = kcb->jprobe_saved_r15; - u8 *addr = (u8 *)regs->pc; - - if ((addr >= (u8 *)jprobe_return) && - (addr <= (u8 *)jprobe_return_end)) { - *regs = kcb->jprobe_saved_regs; - - memcpy((kprobe_opcode_t *)stack_addr, kcb->jprobes_stack, - MIN_STACK_SIZE(stack_addr)); - - kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS; - preempt_enable_no_resched(); - return 1; - } - - return 0; -} - static struct kprobe trampoline_p = { .addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)&kretprobe_trampoline, .pre_handler = trampoline_probe_handler
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-28 7:04 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-05-28 6:59 [PATCH -tip v4 00/27] kprobes: Cleanup jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 6:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 6:59 ` [PATCH -tip v4 01/27] Documentation/kprobes: Fix to remove remaining jprobe Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 6:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:00 ` [PATCH -tip v4 02/27] kprobes: Remove jprobe API implementation Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:00 ` [PATCH -tip v4 03/27] kprobes/x86: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:01 ` [PATCH -tip v4 04/27] ARC: kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:01 ` [PATCH -tip v4 05/27] ARM: kprobes: Remove jprobe arm implementation Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:02 ` [PATCH -tip v4 06/27] arm64: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:02 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:02 ` [PATCH -tip v4 07/27] powerpc/kprobes: Remove jprobe powerpc implementation Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:02 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:03 ` [PATCH -tip v4 08/27] ia64: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:03 ` [PATCH -tip v4 09/27] MIPS: " Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:04 ` [PATCH -tip v4 10/27] s390/kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:04 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:04 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message] 2018-05-28 7:04 ` [PATCH -tip v4 11/27] sh: kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:05 ` [PATCH -tip v4 12/27] sparc64: " Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:05 ` [PATCH -tip v4 13/27] kprobes: Don't check the ->break_handler() in generic kprobes code Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:06 ` [PATCH -tip v4 14/27] kprobes/x86: Don't call ->break_handler() in x86 kprobes Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:06 ` [PATCH -tip v4 15/27] ARC: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in ARC kprobes code Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:07 ` [PATCH -tip v4 16/27] ARM: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in arm " Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:08 ` [PATCH -tip v4 17/27] arm64: " Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:08 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:08 ` [PATCH -tip v4 18/27] powerpc/kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:08 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:09 ` [PATCH -tip v4 19/27] ia64: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in ia64 " Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:09 ` [PATCH -tip v4 20/27] MIPS: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in MIPS " Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:10 ` [PATCH -tip v4 21/27] s390/kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in s390 " Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:10 ` [PATCH -tip v4 22/27] sh: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in SH " Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:11 ` [PATCH -tip v4 23/27] sparc64: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in sparc64 " Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:11 ` [PATCH -tip v4 24/27] bpf: error-inject: kprobes: Clear current_kprobe and enable preempt in kprobe Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:12 ` [PATCH -tip v4 25/27] x86: kprobes: Do not disable preempt on int3 path Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:12 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:12 ` [PATCH -tip v4 26/27] Documentation: kprobes: Add how to change the execution path Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:12 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:13 ` [PATCH -tip v4 27/27] kprobes: Remove jprobe stub API Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-28 7:13 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-30 9:01 ` [PATCH -tip v4 00/27] kprobes: Cleanup jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-30 9:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu 2018-05-31 10:43 ` Naveen N. Rao 2018-05-31 10:43 ` Naveen N. Rao
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=152749109389.15132.10242898017621579145.stgit@devbox \ --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=ast@kernel.org \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \ --cc=hpa@zytor.com \ --cc=jbacik@fb.com \ --cc=jhogan@kernel.org \ --cc=labbott@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \ --cc=mingo@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \ --cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \ --cc=vgupta@synopsys.com \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).