linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH -tip v5 13/27] kprobes: Don't check the ->break_handler() in generic kprobes code
Date: Tue,  5 Jun 2018 00:54:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <152812768890.10068.10235293822737888531.stgit@devbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152812730943.10068.5166429445118734697.stgit@devbox>

Don't check the ->break_handler() from the core kprobes code,
because it was only used by jprobes which got removed.

( In followup patches we'll remove the remaining calls in low level
  arch handlers as well and remove the callback altogether. )

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/kprobes.txt |    2 +-
 kernel/kprobes.c          |   39 +++++----------------------------------
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/kprobes.txt b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
index 5ae80baf3921..907a3017c0f2 100644
--- a/Documentation/kprobes.txt
+++ b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ is optimized, that modification is ignored.  Thus, if you want to
 tweak the kernel's execution path, you need to suppress optimization,
 using one of the following techniques:
 
-- Specify an empty function for the kprobe's post_handler or break_handler.
+- Specify an empty function for the kprobe's post_handler.
 
 or
 
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index 69de130595f7..536ab451e96d 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -627,8 +627,8 @@ static void optimize_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 	    (kprobe_disabled(p) || kprobes_all_disarmed))
 		return;
 
-	/* Both of break_handler and post_handler are not supported. */
-	if (p->break_handler || p->post_handler)
+	/* kprobes with post_handler can not be optimized */
+	if (p->post_handler)
 		return;
 
 	op = container_of(p, struct optimized_kprobe, kp);
@@ -1116,20 +1116,6 @@ static int aggr_fault_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(aggr_fault_handler);
 
-static int aggr_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
-	struct kprobe *cur = __this_cpu_read(kprobe_instance);
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	if (cur && cur->break_handler) {
-		if (cur->break_handler(cur, regs))
-			ret = 1;
-	}
-	reset_kprobe_instance();
-	return ret;
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(aggr_break_handler);
-
 /* Walks the list and increments nmissed count for multiprobe case */
 void kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(struct kprobe *p)
 {
@@ -1270,24 +1256,15 @@ static void cleanup_rp_inst(struct kretprobe *rp)
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(cleanup_rp_inst);
 
-/*
-* Add the new probe to ap->list. Fail if this is the
-* second break_handler at the address
-*/
+/* Add the new probe to ap->list */
 static int add_new_kprobe(struct kprobe *ap, struct kprobe *p)
 {
 	BUG_ON(kprobe_gone(ap) || kprobe_gone(p));
 
-	if (p->break_handler || p->post_handler)
+	if (p->post_handler)
 		unoptimize_kprobe(ap, true);	/* Fall back to normal kprobe */
 
-	if (p->break_handler) {
-		if (ap->break_handler)
-			return -EEXIST;
-		list_add_tail_rcu(&p->list, &ap->list);
-		ap->break_handler = aggr_break_handler;
-	} else
-		list_add_rcu(&p->list, &ap->list);
+	list_add_rcu(&p->list, &ap->list);
 	if (p->post_handler && !ap->post_handler)
 		ap->post_handler = aggr_post_handler;
 
@@ -1310,8 +1287,6 @@ static void init_aggr_kprobe(struct kprobe *ap, struct kprobe *p)
 	/* We don't care the kprobe which has gone. */
 	if (p->post_handler && !kprobe_gone(p))
 		ap->post_handler = aggr_post_handler;
-	if (p->break_handler && !kprobe_gone(p))
-		ap->break_handler = aggr_break_handler;
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ap->list);
 	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&ap->hlist);
@@ -1706,8 +1681,6 @@ static int __unregister_kprobe_top(struct kprobe *p)
 		goto disarmed;
 	else {
 		/* If disabling probe has special handlers, update aggrprobe */
-		if (p->break_handler && !kprobe_gone(p))
-			ap->break_handler = NULL;
 		if (p->post_handler && !kprobe_gone(p)) {
 			list_for_each_entry_rcu(list_p, &ap->list, list) {
 				if ((list_p != p) && (list_p->post_handler))
@@ -1911,7 +1884,6 @@ int register_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
 	rp->kp.pre_handler = pre_handler_kretprobe;
 	rp->kp.post_handler = NULL;
 	rp->kp.fault_handler = NULL;
-	rp->kp.break_handler = NULL;
 
 	/* Pre-allocate memory for max kretprobe instances */
 	if (rp->maxactive <= 0) {
@@ -2034,7 +2006,6 @@ static void kill_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 		list_for_each_entry_rcu(kp, &p->list, list)
 			kp->flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_GONE;
 		p->post_handler = NULL;
-		p->break_handler = NULL;
 		kill_optimized_kprobe(p);
 	}
 	/*

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-06-04 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-04 15:48 [RFC PATCH -tip v5 00/27] kprobes: Cleanup jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:48 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:49 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 01/27] Documentation/kprobes: Fix to remove remaining jprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:49   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:49 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 02/27] kprobes: Remove jprobe API implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:49   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:49 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 03/27] kprobes/x86: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:49   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 04/27] ARC: kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:50   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 05/27] ARM: kprobes: Remove jprobe arm implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:50   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 06/27] arm64: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:51   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-05 15:34   ` Will Deacon
2018-06-05 15:34     ` Will Deacon
2018-06-06  4:42     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-06  4:42       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 07/27] powerpc/kprobes: Remove jprobe powerpc implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:51   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-07 11:31   ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-07 11:31     ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-07 14:23     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-07 14:23       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:52 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 08/27] ia64: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:52   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:52 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 09/27] MIPS: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:52   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:53 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 10/27] s390/kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:53   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:53 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 11/27] sh: kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:53   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:54 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 12/27] sparc64: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:54   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:54 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2018-06-04 15:54   ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 13/27] kprobes: Don't check the ->break_handler() in generic kprobes code Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:55 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 14/27] kprobes/x86: Don't call ->break_handler() in x86 kprobes Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:55   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:55 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 15/27] ARC: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in ARC kprobes code Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:55   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:56 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 16/27] ARM: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in arm " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:56   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:56 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 17/27] arm64: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:56   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-05 15:37   ` Will Deacon
2018-06-05 15:37     ` Will Deacon
2018-06-04 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 18/27] powerpc/kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:57   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-07 11:37   ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-07 11:37     ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-07 14:28     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-07 14:28       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-07 16:37       ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-07 16:37         ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-08  0:42         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-08  0:42           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 19/27] ia64: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in ia64 " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:57   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:58 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 20/27] MIPS: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in MIPS " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:58   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:58 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 21/27] s390/kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in s390 " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:58   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 22/27] sh: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in SH " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:59   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 23/27] sparc64: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in sparc64 " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:59   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 24/27] bpf: error-inject: kprobes: Clear current_kprobe and enable preempt in kprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 16:00   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-07 11:42   ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-07 11:42     ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-04 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 25/27] kprobes/x86: Do not disable preempt on int3 path Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 16:00   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 16:01 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 26/27] Documentation: kprobes: Add how to change the execution path Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 16:01   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 16:01 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 27/27] kprobes: Remove jprobe stub API Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 16:01   ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=152812768890.10068.10235293822737888531.stgit@devbox \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).