From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH -tip v5 26/27] Documentation: kprobes: Add how to change the execution path
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 01:01:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152812806959.10068.3756867273565043166.stgit@devbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152812730943.10068.5166429445118734697.stgit@devbox>
Add a section that explaining how to change the execution
path with kprobes and warnings for some arch.
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
---
Documentation/kprobes.txt | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/kprobes.txt b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
index 3e9e99ea751b..8a98eed1521b 100644
--- a/Documentation/kprobes.txt
+++ b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
@@ -80,6 +80,26 @@ After the instruction is single-stepped, Kprobes executes the
"post_handler," if any, that is associated with the kprobe.
Execution then continues with the instruction following the probepoint.
+Changing Execution Path
+-----------------------
+
+Since the kprobes can probe into a running kernel code, it can change
+the register set, including instruction pointer. This operation
+requires maximum attention, such as keeping the stack frame, recovering
+execution path etc. Since it is operated on running kernel and need deep
+knowladge of the archtecture and concurrent computing, you can easily
+shot your foot.
+
+If you change the instruction pointer (and set up other related
+registers) in pre_handler, you must return !0 so that the kprobes
+stops single stepping and just returns to given address.
+This also means post_handler should not be called anymore.
+
+Note that this operation may be harder on some architectures which
+use TOC (Table of Contents) for function call, since you have to
+setup new TOC for your function in your module, and recover old
+one after back from it.
+
Return Probes
-------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-04 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-04 15:48 [RFC PATCH -tip v5 00/27] kprobes: Cleanup jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:48 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:49 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 01/27] Documentation/kprobes: Fix to remove remaining jprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:49 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 02/27] kprobes: Remove jprobe API implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:49 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 03/27] kprobes/x86: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 04/27] ARC: kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 05/27] ARM: kprobes: Remove jprobe arm implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 06/27] arm64: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-05 15:34 ` Will Deacon
2018-06-05 15:34 ` Will Deacon
2018-06-06 4:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-06 4:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:51 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 07/27] powerpc/kprobes: Remove jprobe powerpc implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-07 11:31 ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-07 11:31 ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-07 14:23 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-07 14:23 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:52 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 08/27] ia64: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:52 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:52 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 09/27] MIPS: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:52 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:53 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 10/27] s390/kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:53 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:53 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 11/27] sh: kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:53 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:54 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 12/27] sparc64: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:54 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:54 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 13/27] kprobes: Don't check the ->break_handler() in generic kprobes code Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:54 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:55 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 14/27] kprobes/x86: Don't call ->break_handler() in x86 kprobes Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:55 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:55 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 15/27] ARC: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in ARC kprobes code Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:55 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:56 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 16/27] ARM: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in arm " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:56 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:56 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 17/27] arm64: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:56 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-05 15:37 ` Will Deacon
2018-06-05 15:37 ` Will Deacon
2018-06-04 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 18/27] powerpc/kprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:57 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-07 11:37 ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-07 11:37 ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-07 14:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-07 14:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-07 16:37 ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-07 16:37 ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-08 0:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-08 0:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 19/27] ia64: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in ia64 " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:57 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:58 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 20/27] MIPS: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in MIPS " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:58 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 21/27] s390/kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in s390 " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 22/27] sh: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in SH " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 23/27] sparc64: kprobes: Don't call the ->break_handler() in sparc64 " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 15:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 24/27] bpf: error-inject: kprobes: Clear current_kprobe and enable preempt in kprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 16:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-07 11:42 ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-07 11:42 ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-06-04 16:00 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 25/27] kprobes/x86: Do not disable preempt on int3 path Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 16:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 16:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2018-06-04 16:01 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 26/27] Documentation: kprobes: Add how to change the execution path Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 16:01 ` [RFC PATCH -tip v5 27/27] kprobes: Remove jprobe stub API Masami Hiramatsu
2018-06-04 16:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152812806959.10068.3756867273565043166.stgit@devbox \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).