From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD267C433DF for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 01:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F61422272 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 01:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="iVM5ap/C" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730231AbgJSBAZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2020 21:00:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56500 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727023AbgJSBAZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2020 21:00:25 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x644.google.com (mail-pl1-x644.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::644]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1363C061755; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 18:00:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x644.google.com with SMTP id w11so4137290pll.8; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 18:00:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bWoMKVJ1YgSUTf5JVsRMziiYu6V0bjJDwj61vEVEUCw=; b=iVM5ap/CPWatRDHPNbFcrK0+YSeezZ1602xdP5jpd7nWENNgo83a+281NE3RosvsA9 3Zu/LQXeo9pbrfow3mRVJjTl6EGXHdirFAK0MgxzjSC8toWGe6k2rT1KctZt9a+Y2WWE NbDk8gN0/qW2nZNTtqck+rN4GotvjwiLRBNI6HVP786PqKtZ0ovd3e2daTZYwpWNEpE/ q9lR8kux/1dtToL8tvls9/KjLHN8LxwgLBgXzqckL7bDb3HZqz/hEBSIjjcwKx0UlzX4 GK+ov5bYVU2m9vt57KLT4IvGzxV4DOzEetpvd3NQ8d/4WdphoeYBcfM0CMhDySWav5JI ELrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bWoMKVJ1YgSUTf5JVsRMziiYu6V0bjJDwj61vEVEUCw=; b=UtYRSto8QSByLDeGSO/dWWvcpXWMWEwJniINH1G3G9XTdU51VmbZiE1fGRF6QPqXtV 5034Y9xyYk9UnfzgEUD/4JE4YGGElcpMY4gy0k4UVmpaljkrsX39yT+n2GJe5M/Ie1zx 12cTQWEZ+7YwTluXCwkoaRQWJZ6TqZU8putqo4SNFGhynMLeZt0jdOp3mYXI+XqEuEId +LUudBRH215hT0Bdio/ibN9co3YwjdfdIfF1cQTg20H7c1/U28h3njRUugtixxAOHB4N c1NwnxtfR8DQm72cPzgQn542Q4+4gPwSYtM1BtnOI0U6xlp4xjdmkGesjL69bujZHuya rwqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530xlAD2Pnbc3kpMaF5F84Mn962FAgWuU1AjPYgf+bm/IHvoQtT5 I6k8IH11ZyaVY5Mrq2OWtmR8zptsa0I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzuM+UFzcdRFrfkF3QURYjFN1fpv1YaOqefDXLCBEPOxpVvUrn558Hj70wcIb9w4WZXOC596A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8693:b029:d5:d861:6f03 with SMTP id g19-20020a1709028693b02900d5d8616f03mr6947093plo.19.1603069222495; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 18:00:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([1.129.225.76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f8sm9521648pga.78.2020.10.18.18.00.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 18 Oct 2020 18:00:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:00:16 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/23] Use asm-generic for mmu_context no-op functions To: Arnd Bergmann , Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-MM References: <20200901141539.1757549-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <159965079776.3591084.10754647036857628984.b4-ty@arndb.de> <20201010130230.69e5c1a5@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1603065477.1e6v5lt5b2.astroid@bobo.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Excerpts from Arnd Bergmann's message of October 10, 2020 6:25 pm: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 4:02 AM Stephen Rothwell w= rote: >> On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:01:22 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> > Are there other changes that depend on this? If not, I would >> > just wait until -rc1 and then either push the branch correctly or >> > rebase the patches on that first, to avoid pushing something that >> > did not see the necessary testing. >> >> If it is useful enough (or important enough), then put in in your >> linux-next included branch, but don't ask Linus to merge it until the >> second week of the merge window ... no worse than some other stuff I >> see :-( >=20 > By itself, it's a nice cleanup, but it doesn't provide any immediate > benefit over the previous state, while potentially introducing a > regression in one of the less tested architectures. >=20 > The question to me is really whether Nick has any pending work > that he would like to submit after this branch is merged into > mainline. Not for this merge window but I was hoping to submit something for improving lazy tlb handling in the next one. Thanks, Nick