From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kbuild: modversions for exported asm symbols Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:03:14 +0200 Message-ID: <16513464.3RM484EDf1@wuerfel> References: <20161015124352.10795-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <7315031.MmlhY1rulM@wuerfel> <20161020145827.453025a6@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20161020145827.453025a6@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nicholas Piggin Cc: Michal Marek , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Thursday, October 20, 2016 2:58:27 PM CEST Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > Yeah, I had the same idea as you and Michal too. It's conceptually nicer, > but in practice it turned into a mess. If some architectures wanted to start > protecting their .h files and including them into .S for the prototypes, we > could start parsing those too. Should we do the quick and dirty way for 4.9? Let's stay with your approach for now. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:49567 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750793AbcJTIDh (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 04:03:37 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kbuild: modversions for exported asm symbols Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:03:14 +0200 Message-ID: <16513464.3RM484EDf1@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: <20161020145827.453025a6@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <20161015124352.10795-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <7315031.MmlhY1rulM@wuerfel> <20161020145827.453025a6@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Nicholas Piggin Cc: Michal Marek , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro Message-ID: <20161020080314.MSo1kN6pApmH2B2DNzXycitVSZiFoQWEngnRNbWyFy4@z> On Thursday, October 20, 2016 2:58:27 PM CEST Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > Yeah, I had the same idea as you and Michal too. It's conceptually nicer, > but in practice it turned into a mess. If some architectures wanted to start > protecting their .h files and including them into .S for the prototypes, we > could start parsing those too. Should we do the quick and dirty way for 4.9? Let's stay with your approach for now. Arnd