linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	riel <riel@surriel.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/23] membarrier: Remove redundant clear of mm->membarrier_state in exec_mmap()
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 11:13:41 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1680283915.24784.1642004021846.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7ab552d8b7f00ec33766f4bf8554c8fc67517bc.1641659630.git.luto@kernel.org>

----- On Jan 8, 2022, at 11:43 AM, Andy Lutomirski luto@kernel.org wrote:

> exec_mmap() supplies a brand-new mm from mm_alloc(), and membarrier_state
> is already 0.  There's no need to clear it again.

Then I suspect we might want to tweak the comment just above the memory barrier ?

        /*
         * Issue a memory barrier before clearing membarrier_state to
         * guarantee that no memory access prior to exec is reordered after
         * clearing this state.
         */

Is that barrier still needed ?

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/membarrier.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/membarrier.c b/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
> index eb73eeaedc7d..c38014c2ed66 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
> @@ -285,7 +285,6 @@ void membarrier_exec_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
> 	 * clearing this state.
> 	 */
> 	smp_mb();
> -	atomic_set(&mm->membarrier_state, 0);
> 	/*
> 	 * Keep the runqueue membarrier_state in sync with this mm
> 	 * membarrier_state.
> --
> 2.33.1

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com




  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-12 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-08 16:43 [PATCH 00/23] mm, sched: Rework lazy mm handling Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 01/23] membarrier: Document why membarrier() works Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-12 15:30   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-01-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 02/23] x86/mm: Handle unlazying membarrier core sync in the arch code Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-12 15:40   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-01-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 03/23] membarrier: Remove membarrier_arch_switch_mm() prototype in core code Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 04/23] membarrier: Make the post-switch-mm barrier explicit Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-12 15:52   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-01-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 05/23] membarrier, kthread: Use _ONCE accessors for task->mm Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-12 15:55   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-01-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 06/23] powerpc/membarrier: Remove special barrier on mm switch Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-10  8:42   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-01-12 15:57   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-01-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 07/23] membarrier: Rewrite sync_core_before_usermode() and improve documentation Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-12 16:11   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-01-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 08/23] membarrier: Remove redundant clear of mm->membarrier_state in exec_mmap() Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-12 16:13   ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2022-01-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 09/23] membarrier: Fix incorrect barrier positions during exec and kthread_use_mm() Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-12 16:30   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-01-12 17:08     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-01-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 10/23] x86/events, x86/insn-eval: Remove incorrect active_mm references Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 11/23] sched/scs: Initialize shadow stack on idle thread bringup, not shutdown Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-10 22:06   ` Sami Tolvanen
2022-01-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 12/23] Rework "sched/core: Fix illegal RCU from offline CPUs" Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 13/23] exec: Remove unnecessary vmacache_seqnum clear in exec_mmap() Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-08 16:43 ` [PATCH 14/23] sched, exec: Factor current mm changes out from exec Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-08 16:44 ` [PATCH 15/23] kthread: Switch to __change_current_mm() Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-08 16:44 ` [PATCH 16/23] sched: Use lightweight hazard pointers to grab lazy mms Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-08 19:22   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-08 22:04     ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-09  0:53       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-09  3:58         ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-09  4:38           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-09 20:19             ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-09 20:48               ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-09 21:51                 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-10  0:52                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-10  2:36                     ` Rik van Riel
2022-01-10  3:51                       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-10  4:56                   ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-01-10  5:17                     ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-01-10 17:19                       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-11  2:24                         ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-01-10 20:52                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-11  3:10                       ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-01-11 15:39                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-11 22:48                           ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-01-12  0:42                             ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-01-11 10:39                 ` Will Deacon
2022-01-11 15:22                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-09  5:56   ` Nadav Amit
2022-01-09  6:48     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-09  8:49       ` Nadav Amit
2022-01-09 19:10         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-09 19:52           ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-09 20:00             ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-09 20:34             ` Nadav Amit
2022-01-09 20:48               ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-09 19:22         ` Rik van Riel
2022-01-09 19:34           ` Nadav Amit
2022-01-09 19:37             ` Rik van Riel
2022-01-09 19:51               ` Nadav Amit
2022-01-09 19:54                 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-08 16:44 ` [PATCH 17/23] x86/mm: Make use/unuse_temporary_mm() non-static Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-08 16:44 ` [PATCH 18/23] x86/mm: Allow temporary mms when IRQs are on Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-08 16:44 ` [PATCH 19/23] x86/efi: Make efi_enter/leave_mm use the temporary_mm machinery Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-10 13:13   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-08 16:44 ` [PATCH 20/23] x86/mm: Remove leave_mm() in favor of unlazy_mm_irqs_off() Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-08 16:44 ` [PATCH 21/23] x86/mm: Use unlazy_mm_irqs_off() in TLB flush IPIs Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-08 16:44 ` [PATCH 22/23] x86/mm: Optimize for_each_possible_lazymm_cpu() Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-08 16:44 ` [PATCH 23/23] x86/mm: Opt in to IRQs-off activate_mm() Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1680283915.24784.1642004021846.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anton@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).